Quote:
Originally Posted by OP_Carl
Speaking of no facts . . . .
This is the first time in my life I've been called a lib - by anyone, anywhere. You discredit yourself in your rash and exceedingly inaccurate labelling of me and knee-jerk defense of President Bush. I still support George W. Bush. He's kept us safe from terrorists lo, these many years. I just don't support his economic policies.
Open up your eyes and you'll see that the era of small-government Republicans ended with Barry Goldwater, with a brief coughing spasm, quickly medicated, during the Reagan years. Both of our two major parties work tirelessly to expand government and erode freedom.
I am a small-government constitutional purist. I am not a fascist, communist, socialist, empirialist, or big-government anything. Most of those 'isms' are implied in the term 'liberal' these days, even though in the strict definition being both liberal and conservative are good things.
For you to blithely clump me in with the 'libs,' in today's parlance, proves that you haven't been paying attention. The only place I'm not considered an ultra-conservative fundamentalist is here on AFF. 
Ron Paul tells it like it is to Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke |
Oh pleeezzz. You find attacks where there is none. My first sentence, "they cannot" applied to you, meaning that you cannot find where GWB's deregs caused the current banking crisis. He just did not do it. Then I went on to speak in general about libs.---that is clear. "If the shoe does not fit"....and, "If someone throws a bone into a pack of dogs calls you don't have to bark."
Threaded Mode
