Quote:
Originally Posted by LUKE2447
Sam the problem with 2 Peter is most scholars don't believe Peter wrote it and would not consider it canon. Not saying it is worthless but def not with the other books of the canon. Also the comments at the end you refer to for Paul are at the end of the text which many wonder if it is a interpolation by Marcionists to give Paul further validity.
I personal don't think 2 Peter is canonical but that is my view.
|
crazy. based on what.
2 peter is every bit as aunthentic as 1 peter. You question 2 peter, the writings of paul, do you also question Esther since the word "God" is not in it. Why not also question Genesis, obviously Moses wasn't there when Creation took place. Perhaps, also cut out all of the things you don't believe Jesus did, ala, Thomas Jefferson.
When you begin to rationalize scripture asway, eventually you will have it whittled down to nothing.
Furthermore, the Bbile has poven to withstand the utmost scrutiny over time, if you could be torn apart, it would have long ago, yet all of the promises continue to be yea and amen.
Threaded Mode
