You Be The Judge: Anderson Vs Burk - Page 16

TK Burk · #**151** 03-26-2009, 09:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve Epley

Elder I have NEVER met a Futurist or read one that believe this? Can you cite one?

Bro. Epley, are you feeling okay today?

I already did when you asked me this same question on the page before.

Quote:

Originally Posted by TK Burk

Here ya go!!!! HERE

And this thread was created BECAUSE of what Jason FIRST said....

See, Bro. Epley, you can be wrong!! Still love you though!!

Be blessed, Elder!

Steve Epley · #**152** 03-26-2009, 09:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TK Burk

Too hot for me?? Hey, it's your men who keep failing at proving AFP is wrong. Now they quit, won't debate, and pick arguments that YOU SAY they'd have to be out of their mind to believe.

Debate?????????????????

You will NOT follow an affrimative argument thus it is speeches not debates.

To debate you must foolow the affirmative argument.

Steve Epley · #**153** 03-26-2009, 09:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TK Burk

Bro. Epley, are you feeling okay today?

I already did when you asked me this same question on the page before.

Be blessed, Elder!

Nope Jason said some of it was fuliflled did you not read what he said? But when you don't follow it doesn't matter.

TK Burk · #**154** 03-26-2009, 10:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve Epley

Again you jump from Andersen to Jason I guess but since you must lead.

Brother, didn't you see that Bro. Anderson decided on the topic, the word count, and he started the debate. I just followed his lead.

But, for the record, can you PLEASE show where Bro. Anderson ever gave any evidence for what the apostles taught concerning the agreed subject?

TK Burk · #**155** 03-26-2009, 10:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve Epley

Nope Jason said some of it was fuliflled did you not read what he said? But when you don't follow it doesn't matter.

Are you sure about that?

Steve Epley · #**156** 03-26-2009, 10:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TK Burk

Are you sure about that?

Yes you posted it.

Steve Epley · #**157** 03-26-2009, 10:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TK Burk

Brother, didn't you see that Bro. Anderson decided on the topic, the word count, and he started the debate. I just followed his lead.

But, for the record, can you PLEASE show where Bro. Anderson ever gave any evidence for what the apostles taught concerning the agreed subject?

You should have followed him and dogged him til the cows came home and he would have to put up or shut up INSTEAD you had your own discussion that did NOT relate to his material.

Digging4Truth · #**158** 03-26-2009, 10:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve Epley

You should have followed him and dogged him til the cows came home and he would have to put up or shut up INSTEAD you had your own discussion that did NOT relate to his material.

Just trying to be helpful here.

He asked if you could "show where"...

TK Burk · #**159** 03-26-2009, 10:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve Epley

Yes you posted it.

Ahhh, but you first denied it was true.

Here you go.

Bro. Epley, it all began here…

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jason

Bro. Benincasa,

I am too tired to deal with that right now,I did post several things in another thread, i believe it was the "start afresh" thread. I am still studying these things, so I am not 100% certain there is a gap in those chapters. But lean towards a gap in Daniel 9:27. Read into that statement what you will.

Because of this Bro. Benincasa asked…

Quote:

Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa

I asked you to please show me where there is a gap in Matthew 24, Luke 21, and Mark 13. I would gather that you would believe in a gap in Daniel, and therefore you should have no problem with finding the gaps in Matthew 24, Luke 21, and Mark 13. For your belief system to be consistent you should show me how those three chapters are future and apply to us today…

…Therefore you can help me by trying your best to explain Matthew 24, Luke 21, and Mark 13, and their gaps.

Jason then responded…

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jason

bro.,

I TAKE ALL OF MATTHEW 24 TO BE FUTURE, while some things did happen in those days, I believe the specific fulfillment will take place in the "end times". I DO NOT SEE A GAP IN ANY OF THE CHAPTERS YOU MENTION. I believe there is a gap in Daniel 9:27, which puts the AOD in the future, not 66AD, not 70AD.

So there you go, Bro. Epley, another AFP telling the truth about what’s found among Futurism.

Steve Epley · #**160** 03-26-2009, 10:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Digging4Truth

Just trying to be helpful here.

He asked if you could "show where"...

I am not computer savy you guys quote small sections I have not idea how to do that. However I never said he proved that I said it was his(Burks) obligation to FOLLOW the affrimative he should have dogged him the entire 600 words instead of starting his own discussion that has zip to do with the affirmiate.