Jason DEBATE MATTHEW 24 Luke21 Mark 13

[edjen01]

Originally Posted by Steve Epley

No I am a dispensationalist.
Jesus was asked 3 questions in Mt. 24 he answered them all.
1. When shall these things be? The destruction of the temple
2. The sign of thy coming
3. the end of the world.
One is past two are future. Most preterist BOTH Partial & Full believe ALL of Mt. 24 was fulfilled in 70 AD along with every prophecy thus God has had NOTHING to say about the last 1900 years of man's history NOR the future.
All prophecy is a little obscure footnote in a history book which the majority of the populace has never heard of.
Futurist teach what Jesus & Apostles taught that Jesus truly is comng again to catch His church away, resurrect the dead, judge the wicked.
MARANATHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

just a couple questions....did Jesus state that this all had to happen after thousands of years?...how do we know what ALL the Apostles taught...when only a few of thier writings were voted to be acceptable?

[pelathais]

Originally Posted by edjen01

just a couple questions....did Jesus state that this all had to happen after thousands of years?...how do we know what ALL the Apostles taught...when only a few of thier writings were voted to be acceptable?

What apostolic writings were ever voted as "unacceptable?"

[Steve Epley]

Originally Posted by edjen01

just a couple questions....did Jesus state that this all had to happen after thousands of years?...how do we know what ALL the Apostles taught...when only a few of thier writings were voted to be acceptable?

There you go ridicule the Bible that makes sense.

[edjen01]

Originally Posted by pelathais

What apostolic writings were ever voted as "unacceptable?"

many...remember who was doing the voting. do you consider Acts to be an "Apostlic" writing?

[edjen01]

Originally Posted by Steve Epley

There you go ridicule the Bible that makes sense.

Please to not accuse me of something that I did not do.

A strong point was made about following what the Apostles taught...and I simply wanted to know how we could be sure of this since many of the Apostles do not have writings included in the canon.

[Steve Epley]

Originally Posted by edjen01

Please to not accuse me of something that I did not do.

A strong point was made about following what the Apostles taught...and I simply wanted to know how we could be sure of this since many of the Apostles do not have writings included in the canon.

What are those?

[edjen01]

Originally Posted by Steve Epley

What are those?

well....since most of the canonized books were written by St.Paul, St.Peter, or St.John....and depending on if you believe there are 11, 12, or 13 Apostles...then several Apostles did not get writings included in the canon.

[pelathais]

Originally Posted by edjen01

many...remember who was doing the voting. do you consider Acts to be an "Apostlic" writing?

Name one.

[TK Burk]

Jason, have you contacted Prax yet to set up the debate? How close are you to beginning?

[Jason B]

Originally Posted by TK Burk

Jason, have you contacted Prax yet to set up the debate? How close are you to beginning?

I sent him a pm, and Prax pm'd me back and said me EB and I have to first agree what we are going to debate, and THEN we can get to it.

If we can come to an agreement, I probably wouldn't want to start until after the weekend, normally I am geting things together for sunday on friday and/or saturday.

But at this point I'm waiting on EB.