Quote:
Originally Posted by Pressing-On
Ooops, I meant admissible. Well, he won't get anywhere with the lawsuit not allowing the TSA to be privy to his actions beforehand.
|
PO, my point is, I dont think he needs that tape to prove he was detained illegally.
they detained him for having LEGAL AMERICAN TENDER.
Nothing concerning any of the susequint conversations would be required to prove he was detained.
Now if there is some legal protection that TSA has where they are instructed to detain someone for carrying cash, then they might be off the hook, but if there is, then that needs to go to the supreme court to over turn it.
wacky.
Threaded Mode
