Supreme Court to Hear Case on Obama

[Twisp]

Originally Posted by Esther

All of this matters because President Obama has still not provided simple, incontrovertible proof of his exact birthplace. That information would be included on his long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate which Obama has steadfastly refused to release amid a flurry of conflicting reports.

The application to get your birth certificate from Hawaii does not have an option for a short form or a long form. He had to take whatever they sent him, which is the one he has released.

Originally Posted by Esther

WND has reported that just within the last week, at least two reports have cited Obama's birth in Kenya. Wikipedia also was found to have been reporting on Obama's birth in Kenya, before a series of scrubs placed his birth in Honolulu.

From what sources?

Originally Posted by Esther

That came on the heels of several online information sites changing the president's supposed birthplace from one hospital in Hawaii to another, after WND broke the news of the letter said to be from the White House.

A simple mistake, one which has been corrected.

Originally Posted by Esther

WND has yet to be able to identify any physician or medical attendant present at Kapi'olani in 1961 who can recall Ann Dunham, Obama's mother, giving birth to Barack Obama at the hospital or who can identify the name of the attending physician.

While not a teacher, she does remember the birth:
http://www.buffalonews.com/494/story/554495.html

Originally Posted by Esther

Now the Department of Defense has allegedly compelled a private employer to fire a U.S. Army Reserve major from his civilian job after he had his military deployment orders revoked for arguing he should not be required to serve under a president who has not proven his eligibility for office.

Allegedly being the key word, since there is no factual evidence of this.

Originally Posted by Esther

IF I say again IF he really was born in the states I believe he would have gladly shown proof of such, and I am truly amazed the Congress has not demanded proof.

He has shown proof. It was sufficient enough for the presidential election vetting process.

Besides that, as unbiased as the conspiracy minority may think WND is, I counted 9 stories questioning Obama's birth on the homepage, all right near the top. If a site consistently pushes an agenda like that, it is not unbiased. Perhaps there are no other sources?

A side note, does anyone have any information on the official vetting process for presidential candidates? I have to imagine it is intensive, but I have not found the actual process outlined anywhere.