Quote:
Originally Posted by gloryseeker
Although I am not neutral on this, looking at it from a neutral position you have given arguments and have used references to support your arguments.
The opposing side, especially Coadie, has used arguments and has used references to support his arguments.
The things that you have called "facts" which is only references to support your argument, are called into question as being legitimate, which is a legitimate argument just as your assertion that the reference points that coadie has presented are not accurate -- a legitimate argument.
However, from a neutral position looking at the two (although I am not neutral) the basis, background, extent of coadie's arguments has far more validity that he knows what he is talking about verses someone who is just supporting a position.
That's my take anyway
|
So you say we both have references that we call facts, yet coadie's arguments have far more validity? lol.
Coadie has shown scant few, if any, sources. Everything he has said has been refuted from outside sources:
Obama's birth certificate does have an embossed seal and signature.
People do recall Obama's birth in Hawaii.
There is not proof of him being a citizen of Indonesia.
American's were able to travel legally to Pakistan in 1981.
Obama was born in Hawaii, so his parent's citizenship has no bearing on his own.
The transcript of his grandmother's interview has no mention of him being born in Kenya.
If you look through my posts, I have provided links to credible news sites, newspaper sites, and other sites that back up what the majority of America, including the court system, believes.
Coadie has been asked several time to provide sources for his accusations. He rarely does.
Threaded Mode
