Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The Fellowship Hall > The Newsroom > Political Talk
Facebook

Notices

Political Talk Political News


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #271  
Old 07-23-2009, 01:50 PM
coadie coadie is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,889
Another forged/fake document

Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeinAR View Post
As much fun as it would be to continue to prove that coadie hasn't proved anything, I'm moving on.

moveon.org It's absurdity backed by nothing but the right wing nutty blogosphere and that type of "proof". Obviously, coadie's "proof" hasn't made it to a federal court house because it's bunk.

The executive privelege excuse is foolish.


Quote:
If executive priviledge excuse was foolish, It looks like he was foolish the first day on the job. I agree he is foolish. Can never be too careful if your documents are forged.
It was clear in January of 2008 that BO was going to compete for the Dem. nomination, thus giving the GOP and RNC 11 months to pursue the legality of his citizenship. Logic assures us that they did vet it and that there was nothing to disqualify BO from the Presidency or they would have used it against him. I'm sure his fierce rivals in the GOP wouldn't have waited until the election was lost to pursue that matter. That's logic.

When and if a U.S. court decides this is worth hearing, I'll comment further. Until then, I'm going to bow out of this rumor mongering distraction that coade, newman and the others who are still upset about the election would like to continue talking about. There depleted party got it's collective tail handed to it in the election and it's a bitter pill for them to swallow.

Until it's brought before a court, I'll consider it wild speculation fueled by a deep dislike/hatred of Barack Obama.

coadie, when a State or Federal court decides to hear this matter, you be sure and start a new thread and inform the rest of us that all your "proof" actually was "proof" and not just drivel from the usual right wing sources.
Obama filled out his selective service form
form created 2008
filled out in 1980 impossible
Has a stamp on it that was expired by 10 years
they printed this response several days before it was requested
Obama's address is in Hawaaii but he claims he was in school at Occidental
And was also in chicago doing the registration?
Obama claims he registered for the draft.
It was not required by law, why did he do it?
Obama's Selective Service Registration Form is Apparently 1990 Form Altered to Appear Like 1980 Form


http://www.debbieschlussel.com/archi...ive_did_n.html

Some Obamapologists are claiming this is a fake



More dishonesty mike. He was running for the Democrat candidacy untill August. he was not a candidate for Pres until they made him one. The Dems started checking him out and he interferred.

Aren't you glad to see his messed up selective service registration? Coming from a conservative at that.

Have twisp help some more. With the economic fiasco, are you trying to sound like an independent and democrat not so much?

Why didn't the Dems tell us he hadn't been checked?
Reply With Quote
  #272  
Old 07-23-2009, 02:22 PM
HeavenlyOne HeavenlyOne is offline
Lofty, Scientific, and Literal


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 11,736
Re: Supreme Court to Hear Case on Obama

Quote:
Originally Posted by coadie View Post
You are not shrewd enough to know no one has proven Obama's place of birth. Talk to the Clinton democrats. They are the ones that spent the money.

Yes I do not believe snopes. Snopes is for dishonest people. This month they started telling us obama was born at Queens hospital and by the 10th of July they changed it to Kapiolani Hospital. As soon as we find snopes to be dishonest, i must go along with why they are motivated to be so.



When people refer to a blog named snopes, it means they have no research tools or training. Snopes doesn't lift a finger ever and travel to pursue records. You can't prove you had lunch tuesday.

Why would I beleive anything without a doc's signature? Why in the world would someone in medicine accept an item generated in 2007 regarding a hospital matter from 1961. No hospital name or confirmation. None. That is proof? You are not close to serious.


http://www.wnd.com/files/baro.pdf

Even last fall the HI paper tells us when he was born, the address someone put in the paper was wrong. Dad was living somewhere else. So Obama lied about hospitals. I couldn't care less which one. As abortionists, democrats claim they are a blob until birth. Then where was he born and turned from a blob into a baby? where is the hospital generated document that shows us. start at the beginning.

It is interesting to see the democrats get their diapers in a knot defending the man. The reason he obstructs documents is we will find them filled with contradictions. He even lied about his selective service registration.
I don't know about Hawaii, but I have my original birth certificate from IL, and it doesn't have my doctor's signature on it. I have the original certificates for my children, also born in IL, and neither of them have the delivering doctor's name on them either. My BC has the hospital name where I was born, but neither of my children's BC's state that, only the city and state they were born. In fact, the certificates I have for them say nothing about a certificate of birth. It's just a document with their full name, sex, race, date of birth, mother's name, place of birth, and it's signed and sealed by the county clerk.

So what's the point? Me and my children don't have proof that we are natural born US citizens according to you?

What about children born at home? There is no doctor to sign papers for a birth certificate. Amish children aren't natural born either, I suppose.

Now, do you have proof, or will we just continue hearing from you?
__________________
I've gone and done it now! I'm on Facebook!!!
My Countdown Counting down to: My world crashing to the ground.
Is this what being 40 is all about???
Reply With Quote
  #273  
Old 07-23-2009, 07:51 PM
coadie coadie is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,889
Re: Supreme Court to Hear Case on Obama

Quote:
Originally Posted by HeavenlyOne View Post
I don't know about Hawaii, but I have my original birth certificate from IL, and it doesn't have my doctor's signature on it. I have the original certificates for my children, also born in IL, and neither of them have the delivering doctor's name on them either. My BC has the hospital name where I was born, but neither of my children's BC's state that, only the city and state they were born. In fact, the certificates I have for them say nothing about a certificate of birth. It's just a document with their full name, sex, race, date of birth, mother's name, place of birth, and it's signed and sealed by the county clerk.

So what's the point? Me and my children don't have proof that we are natural born US citizens according to you?

What about children born at home? There is no doctor to sign papers for a birth certificate. Amish children aren't natural born either, I suppose.

Now, do you have proof, or will we just continue hearing from you?
another clueless rant.
No recollection of your birth certificate is not how we determine case law.
You also have not read or understood how hospitals work. Home births and hospital births all have boxes signed by witnesses.
Medical people understand the long form which Obama is hiding tells us what he doesn't want seen

After review of your posts, it seems you are defending Obama and i am discussing his behavior and non cooperation.

Google your heart out.
natural
Natural born
Naturalization
natural birth

Very different topics. Twisp used some of the expressions interchangeably and didn't get it.

It seems like you think like a criminal. I will be specific. A criminal beleives no crime was commited if the crime was not proven.
You believe his Certificate of birth
I will tell you again and it didn't soak the last few times. Obama has cast doubt on his birth history and records. He has talked about two birth documents and they do not and cannot match
The burden of proof is on him and not the people raising the question.
What is his alibi?
What is your alibi?

It has been duly noted that he lied about his hospital of birth.

Are you going to explain it or tell me he didn't?

The burden of proof is on the side of the deciever. That is the law.
He lied about the birth being one of two hospitals and shifted his story or alibi since his self glorifying web ste December.
So we have ask you to prove where he was born by reason of a third party witness or we have no choice but to reject your claim.

Koolaid drinkers don't like the burden of proof directed where it must be.
This like a drug test. The druggies won't cooperate and give a sample. They just repeat prove it. Shift the proof. States arrest people that refuse to coopperate or give a test. You think like a criminal. You reject his submission to proving his claim.

List of items i have shared that have shown discrepancies on Obama's part

Marriage liscense application
birth certificate
selective service registration

You are the 4th person on this thread to give up without supporting why a reasonable rational mind should be considered a citizen to meet thhe stadards for POTUS.

while you are wearing your criminal thinking cap, at such time Obama has conducted mischief and lied about his citizenship and passport and legal name in any way, his Illinois Bar certificate becomes cause for disbarment.

If I share the details with you how that works, you won't understand.

I do have sources that tell me how and why Michelle Obama got her liscense revoked. I am still waiting to confirm it.
Reply With Quote
  #274  
Old 07-23-2009, 10:29 PM
Twisp's Avatar
Twisp Twisp is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,754
Re: Supreme Court to Hear Case on Obama

Quote:
Originally Posted by coadie View Post
another clueless rant.
No recollection of your birth certificate is not how we determine case law.
You also have not read or understood how hospitals work. Home births and hospital births all have boxes signed by witnesses.
Medical people understand the long form which Obama is hiding tells us what he doesn't want seen

After review of your posts, it seems you are defending Obama and i am discussing his behavior and non cooperation.

Google your heart out.
natural
Natural born
Naturalization
natural birth

Very different topics. Twisp used some of the expressions interchangeably and didn't get it.

It seems like you think like a criminal. I will be specific. A criminal beleives no crime was commited if the crime was not proven.
You believe his Certificate of birth
I will tell you again and it didn't soak the last few times. Obama has cast doubt on his birth history and records. He has talked about two birth documents and they do not and cannot match
The burden of proof is on him and not the people raising the question.
What is his alibi?
What is your alibi?

It has been duly noted that he lied about his hospital of birth.

Are you going to explain it or tell me he didn't?

The burden of proof is on the side of the deciever. That is the law.
He lied about the birth being one of two hospitals and shifted his story or alibi since his self glorifying web ste December.
So we have ask you to prove where he was born by reason of a third party witness or we have no choice but to reject your claim.

Koolaid drinkers don't like the burden of proof directed where it must be.
This like a drug test. The druggies won't cooperate and give a sample. They just repeat prove it. Shift the proof. States arrest people that refuse to coopperate or give a test. You think like a criminal. You reject his submission to proving his claim.

List of items i have shared that have shown discrepancies on Obama's part

Marriage liscense application
birth certificate
selective service registration

You are the 4th person on this thread to give up without supporting why a reasonable rational mind should be considered a citizen to meet thhe stadards for POTUS.

while you are wearing your criminal thinking cap, at such time Obama has conducted mischief and lied about his citizenship and passport and legal name in any way, his Illinois Bar certificate becomes cause for disbarment.

If I share the details with you how that works, you won't understand.

I do have sources that tell me how and why Michelle Obama got her liscense revoked. I am still waiting to confirm it.
I am pretty sure none of us have "given" up. There was nothing to ever give up. You and others stated a conspiracy with nothing to back it up.

Now, we are just enjoying the hilarity that is your posts. We sincerely appreciate the comic relief you provide us.
Reply With Quote
  #275  
Old 07-23-2009, 11:02 PM
coadie coadie is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,889
Re: Supreme Court to Hear Case on Obama

I am doing fine. Twisp got off the fast food job. I am sorting. some folks support obama regardless of what he does and some people support him and identify his covering up falsehoods. Obama adherents must be afraid of a right wing conspiracy since the mention it.
It still looks like the greatest fear would be \Obama releasing documents that could convict him of perjury.
So as long as they can hide "proof" he is safe.
Reply With Quote
  #276  
Old 07-24-2009, 06:11 AM
HeavenlyOne HeavenlyOne is offline
Lofty, Scientific, and Literal


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 11,736
Re: Supreme Court to Hear Case on Obama

Quote:
Originally Posted by Twisp View Post
I am pretty sure none of us have "given" up. There was nothing to ever give up. You and others stated a conspiracy with nothing to back it up.

Now, we are just enjoying the hilarity that is your posts. We sincerely appreciate the comic relief you provide us.
I'm not giving up either. I'm just waiting on someone to provide proof that disputes what's already been shown instead of posting childish insults and topics that have no relevance.

Coadie is well known for posting his thoughts as facts then insulting people when they ask for proof. Him having PhD's isn't enough for me.
__________________
I've gone and done it now! I'm on Facebook!!!
My Countdown Counting down to: My world crashing to the ground.
Is this what being 40 is all about???
Reply With Quote
  #277  
Old 07-24-2009, 07:22 AM
Twisp's Avatar
Twisp Twisp is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,754
Re: Supreme Court to Hear Case on Obama

Quote:
Originally Posted by coadie View Post
I am doing fine. Twisp got off the fast food job. I am sorting. some folks support obama regardless of what he does and some people support him and identify his covering up falsehoods. Obama adherents must be afraid of a right wing conspiracy since the mention it.
It still looks like the greatest fear would be \Obama releasing documents that could convict him of perjury.
So as long as they can hide "proof" he is safe.
No, most people support the truth. Since the FEC have deemed him qualified, and none of his accusers have been able to show proof, it is a non-issue.
Reply With Quote
  #278  
Old 07-24-2009, 07:30 AM
Twisp's Avatar
Twisp Twisp is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,754
Re: Supreme Court to Hear Case on Obama

Yet another story about republicans thinking President Obama is a citizen of the United States, including Bill O'Reilly and Michelle Malkin. It is nice to see the the republican side doesn't agree with the few fringe crazies:

http://www.examiner.com/x-3108-Balti...s-a-US-citizen
Reply With Quote
  #279  
Old 07-24-2009, 08:01 AM
HeavenlyOne HeavenlyOne is offline
Lofty, Scientific, and Literal


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 11,736
Re: Supreme Court to Hear Case on Obama

Quote:
Originally Posted by Twisp View Post
Yet another story about republicans thinking President Obama is a citizen of the United States, including Bill O'Reilly and Michelle Malkin. It is nice to see the the republican side doesn't agree with the few fringe crazies:

http://www.examiner.com/x-3108-Balti...s-a-US-citizen
It's obvious that Coadie hasn't talked to them yet. I'm sure as soon as he's able to show them his 'proof', they will cross right over!!
__________________
I've gone and done it now! I'm on Facebook!!!
My Countdown Counting down to: My world crashing to the ground.
Is this what being 40 is all about???
Reply With Quote
  #280  
Old 07-24-2009, 08:06 AM
TJJJ's Avatar
TJJJ TJJJ is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,596
Re: Supreme Court to Hear Case on Obama

Just curious Coadie,

Do you believe that they really landed on the moon?

Do you believe that the government was really behind 9/11

Just wondering/
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Obama's Supreme Court pick... Baron1710 Political Talk 88 06-16-2009 02:13 PM
Stupid Lawsuit Get Supreme Court Conference deacon blues Political Talk 14 12-05-2008 11:08 PM
Craziness in Canadian Supreme Court Pro31:28 Fellowship Hall 1 06-26-2008 06:01 PM
Gun law struck down by Supreme Court Baron1710 Fellowship Hall 17 06-26-2008 10:02 AM
Texas Supreme Court vindicates pastor Pressing-On The Newsroom 3 07-09-2007 11:41 AM

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by Salome
- by Amanah

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.