Why Acts 2:38 Uses The Word “remission”

[SDG]

Originally Posted by Steve Epley

This is what Dan said. He is implying obeying Acts 2:38 does not save and to preach so is to say that Christ's death-burial-resurrection are not enough. Sounds pious however if he says faith and repentance is required then according to his own "logic" Christ's death-burial-resurrection is not enough. In the words of Rush Limbaugh "words mean something."

So again Dan is faith and repentance required and if so was not His death-burial-resurrection enough????????????????????????????????

I think my words stand for themselves Elder ... morph them as you wish ... and BTW the righteous are rapture ready.