|
Re: John 6:66
I wasn't saying this was some major insight on what the mark of the beast is or anything like that. I was simply saying this was interesting. It's not something to make a doctrine out of or even to validate a doctrine. I just noticed these coincidences and thought they were interesting like most coincidences are.
If I was going to use this finding as anything it would be to show how wrong it is to attribute any kind of meaning to something simply because a coincidence exists.
|
Threaded Mode
