Quote:
Originally Posted by Brett Prince
You kinda have me wondering...
Did you READ ALL that I posted?
Did you note that I said Thad OUGHT TO DO IT?
Did you note that I said the UCs of CA would feel this way?
I understand your difference with them on this. I differ with them for a DIFFERENT reason than you.
Please make sure that you don't ascribe what they hold to me, because my post clearly delineates what I think about what Thad should do, from what I think the UCs will think of it.
I was making an observation--not a declaration.
Guess I'm a little testy, as Thad seemed to take the position that I agreed with the UCs. NOT the case, at least THIS time.  |
Did I read everything you said...YES.
Did I see where you said he ought to do it...YES.
I think the issue here is what all the Ultra Cons in this state/district think of everyone else. Frankly, I don't care. No matter if you did everything right...you are still not "one of them" and will never "measure" up. Your post was more of ...do you see why they feel this way about your church. This one incident has nothing to do with what they think about his church. It is because his pastor is not one of the CONS. I've said it before...and I will say it again...if one is not part of the VM or NW camp....they are the talk of the district and that is it.
Threaded Mode
