Weird! What are some of your thoughts???

[Aquila]

Originally Posted by MissBrattified

I read that Mayans used to bind their children's heads in a similar fashion to Chinese foot-binding, in order to get an elongated shape. They would also hang a bead between the eyes so that their eyes would become permanently crossed, and file their teeth to points.

That's awesome. Why don't we do that any more. I think it would cut down on those kids being bullied. I mean... they'd look scary. lol

[easter]

OH THIS IS HORRIBLE!!!
CHECK IT OUT

http://www.myseveralworlds.com/2007/...e-footbinding/

[Digging4Truth]

Originally Posted by mfblume

Now I know why you like dabbling with UR, bro.

Where does all this tie in with UR?

[mfblume]

Originally Posted by Digging4Truth

Where does all this tie in with UR?

Strong curiosity in the unusual.

[mfblume]

Originally Posted by Aquila

I just thought this stuff was really weird. More weird than your disembodied resurrection theory.

You mean full preterism's disembodied resurrection theory. Not mine. I thought you knew that difference with partial preterism.

[Digging4Truth]

Originally Posted by mfblume

Strong curiosity in the unusual.

Seriously?

And people say that PP's will all eventually be FP's... that's making an awful big assumption on someone because of what others have seen.

Wouldn't you say that your statement is much of the same?

[NotforSale]

Originally Posted by Digging4Truth

Seriously?

And people say that PP's will all eventually be FP's... that's making an awful big assumption on someone because of what others have seen.

Wouldn't you say that your statement is much of the same?

[Jeffrey]

Originally Posted by mfblume

Now I know why you like dabbling with UR, bro.

[Jeffrey]

Not a fan of the Sci Fi channel. I'm outta here. Leave you Trekkies to figure all these mysteries out.

[mfblume]

Originally Posted by Digging4Truth

Seriously?

And people say that PP's will all eventually be FP's... that's making an awful big assumption on someone because of what others have seen.

Wouldn't you say that your statement is much of the same?

No. Unusual is unusual. What is so assuming about that?