Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Smith
Yes he did. It's fairly subversive, fairly subtle, but he did. He is refusing to take part with the UPC while proclaiming his glowing adoration of it. You can't have it both ways. Jesus said it's either one way or the other, right? "For me or against me."
I happen to be comfortable enough in my own skin to openly admit, I'm against it. John wants to sugarcoat it. "I love you but I want nothing to do with you." Nuh uh.
|
Refusing to take part in an organization while not blasting it like everyone else is not taking a shot at the UPC. There is no both ways here. He doesn't attack the UPC while he also would not be a member. So using the reverse logic if I would never be a member of any organization I spend my time blasting those organizations? Sorry that just does not make sense. I didn't see him blasting the UPC in his opening post. He simply pointed out he would not be able to be UPC. He never said why. He never said the UPC was bad. He just said he could not be UPC...I could not be Mormon, but that's not taking a shot at them.
Threaded Mode
