Quote:
Originally Posted by jfrog
You do realize that the very fact you have to go into a long discourse to try and explain that verse to where it is compatible with your theology gives others the license to go into long discourses and explain why it is compatible with theirs. The fact is that verse is not straightforward and requires interpretation and qualification such as your mother of all living that has a mother. Or such as coadies explanation that animals are not part of all living even though Genesis 1:30 says they are alive. The point was and still is that yall should have never brought it up as evidence against Pel's position. |
You need a teaching moment. Eve is the mother of all
living souls as is written in
Genesis 2
You are dishonest. I did not say Eve was the mother of all that was alive.
You take 1:30 and drop part of the verse
30And to every beast of the earth, and to every fowl of the air, and to every thing that creepeth upon the earth,
wherein there is life,
I have given every green herb for meat: and it was so.
2:7And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man
became a living soul.
Atheists/evolutionists selectively ignore verses that do not fit their dogma.
28And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and
have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every
living thing that moveth upon the earth.
jfrog, I get your tactics for years on the atheeeeist boards. Darwinists on this board act just like the atheists elsewhere.
You misquote, make up quotes and misquote scripture. Leaving out verses no wonder Darwinists don't Love or respect the Word of God.
Threaded Mode
