Quote:
Originally Posted by BeenThinkin
JD I agree with you on this. I didn't receive the same thoughts that Mr. Smith did from MOW's post. I think what MOW said has been "broadbrushed!" into more than he said. He spoke of what he had knowledge of, and even mentioned that he, (I believe he said), fellowshipped with more blacks than whites. If he had no knowledge of whites and "down-low," he could not speak about them. He spoke of what he knew the most about.
I guess the "shooters" can go ahead and shoot at me now and give MOW a little relief. .... "Just shoot up here among us, some of us need relief!" Thanks Jerry Clower for that remark! I guess we need a Mississippi Squirel revival!
Bishop Long should be really proud of MOW's remarks. MOW's remarks sure changed the rhythm of the post ...... "Charismatic Bishop In Lawsuit!" and Bishop Long is getting "a little relief!"
BT
|
The problem is, BT, race was NEVER mentioned in this thread, or anywhere else I've seen or heard the Long issue discussed. Honestly, it's never crossed my mind. So why not just say, "I know of this with several preachers" rather than, "Black preachers"? Why even bring it up? I think that's a fair question. Why bring it up? This is a problem in our society, in the ministry, in our schools, etc., and it has NOTHING to do with race. ZILCH. Nothing! Why bring race into the picture when this is NOT a racial problem?
I cannot figure out why MOW would even need to use the word. NO ONE brought it up, until he said it was a problem with black preachers.