Quote:
Originally Posted by rdp
Silly me for actually believing the instructions "not with gold jewelry"....what was I thinkin'  ???? Guess we should start consulting w/ Origen & his allegorical hermeneutic??? |
Please submit Origen's exegesis for examination. Would love to read it.
Of course, in your book, Origen wasn't even saved!!
And, of course, silly rabbit, no one is saying to not accept the phrase you have produced on this thread 1,000,000,000,000,000 times. We are asking you to decide the meaning of what is being in said... in context! That's it. Not a lot to that. So as much as you get red-faced screaming "NOT WITH... can't you idiots read!" it's going to do no good. Red Herron. Straw man. You pick the "logical fallacy" that applies.... rightly handling the Word of truth. Not using a person's letter as a legal code to take a phrase and declare it's meaning "literal" without identifying the "literal context" of what is being said.
Threaded Mode
