How the TSA shakes down a fully armed squad

[sandie]

Originally Posted by Aquila

That's a great question!

One good example is how terrorist organizations are using implants in women to get explosive material past screening. Most don't know that. So if a woman is examined more thoroughly, she feels violated, not knowing what they are looking for.

I would feel violated if they drew me a picture showing me what they were looking for.

There's an old saying....I'd at least like dinner and a movie first....

[Aquila]

Be back soon. I have a meeting.

[coadie]

Originally Posted by Digging4Truth

Didn't coadie just quote the TSA website?

I did.

[Digging4Truth]

Originally Posted by coadie

I did.

Since this is not acceptable for Aquila I guess that means that he agrees with us... the TSA doesn't know what they are talking about.

[coadie]

Originally Posted by Digging4Truth

Since this is not acceptable for Aquila I guess that means that he agrees with us... the TSA doesn't know what they are talking about.

This is how Aquila creates a security risk for the gubment. Viruses come when gubment workers steal time and blog all day between meetings.

B. Personal use: Activity that is conducted for purposes other than accomplishing official or otherwise authorized activity. Executive Branch employees are specifically prohibited from using government office equipment to maintain or support a personal private business. Examples of this prohibition include employees using a government computer and Internet connection to run a travel business or investment service. The ban on using government office equipment to support a personal private business also includes employees using government office equipment to assist relatives, friends, or other persons in such activities. Employees may, however, make limited use under this policy of government office equipment to check their Thrift Savings Plan or other personal investments, or to seek employment, or communicate with a volunteer charity organization.

[iceniez]

Stupid is as Stupid does.

[Falla39]

I received this in an e-mail this morning!


This is brilliant!

Wonder why nobody thought of this before?
Here's a solution to all the controversy over full-body scanners at the airports:

All we need to do is develop a booth that you can step into that will not X-ray you, but will detonate any explosive device you may have hidden on or in your body. The explosion will be contained within the sealed booth.

This would be a win-win for everyone. There would be no racial profiling and the device would eliminate long and expensive trials......... This is so simple it's brilliant!
I can see it now: you're in the airport terminal and you hear a muffled explosion. Shortly thereafter an announcement comes over the PA system, "Attention standby passengers, we now have a seat available on flight number... "

[sandie]

Originally Posted by Falla39

I received this in an e-mail this morning!


This is brilliant!

Wonder why nobody thought of this before?
Here's a solution to all the controversy over full-body scanners at the airports:

All we need to do is develop a booth that you can step into that will not X-ray you, but will detonate any explosive device you may have hidden on or in your body. The explosion will be contained within the sealed booth.

This would be a win-win for everyone. There would be no racial profiling and the device would eliminate long and expensive trials......... This is so simple it's brilliant!
I can see it now: you're in the airport terminal and you hear a muffled explosion. Shortly thereafter an announcement comes over the PA system, "Attention standby passengers, we now have a seat available on flight number... "

[Aquila]

I think all our questions would be answered if we could answer the following questions. If a gay man goes through airport screening, is he screened as one gay man, two gay men, or three gay men? If he gets groped by a gay TSA agent, should they be given the right to marry? If not, is it fornication? Should the passenger have the right to sue? And what should we do if this happened prior to 70 AD? lol

[Aquila]

Originally Posted by Digging4Truth

Since this is not acceptable for Aquila I guess that means that he agrees with us... the TSA doesn't know what they are talking about.

Digging,

Coadie didn't answer the question. I do this for a living. The TSA website isn't going to list everything they do in relation to their processes or our processes because the information is considered SSI and is governed by 49 C.F.R. parts 15 and 1520. Disclosure of the information is governed by 5 U.S.C. 552 and 49 C.F.R. parts 15 and 1520. Coadie doesn't know what he's talking about.

Coadie said Pizza Hut and Taco Bell have more strict hiring procedures. I asked him to prove it.