Did Jesus Wear Pants?

[JoeBandy]

Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa

The pants worn during the time of Christ, and before that in the near and Middle East. Were worn by soldiers, calvary, and even infantry. Trousers weren’t worn by the women. Parthian horseman wore trousers, Celtic warriors wore trousers which were adopted by the Romans.

If this is the case why would girding up loins be a thing??

[JoeBandy]

Originally Posted by 1ofthechosen

Joe I commend you on this, way to hit the ball out of the park. I don't know why I ever doubted you....

5 million comedians out of work ……….

[Amanah]

Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa

The pants worn during the time of Christ, and before that in the near and Middle East. Were worn by soldiers, calvary, and even infantry. Trousers weren’t worn by the women. Parthian horseman wore trousers, Celtic warriors wore trousers which were adopted by the Romans.

[Evang.Benincasa]

Originally Posted by Amanah

Therefore we have a western Christian civilization having men wear the pants in the family.

Slowly but surely that had been eroded away, until we come to where we are now. Gender neutrality.

Hence Rachel Rose can move freely among the modern population.

The way churches are going they too will slouch towards Gomorrah.

[Evang.Benincasa]

Originally Posted by JoeBandy

If this is the case why would girding up loins be a thing??

That's wearing a belt to keep your pants up.

Why would a guy need a belt if he wore a dress?

[Evang.Benincasa]

Originally Posted by JoeBandy

I am glad everyone is not like me, that would make the world a very strange place. There is not one post I have made where I have cried about any one not being like me. You are a master of taking things out of context and twisting words. Bashing and disagreeing are two different things. I am sure you are a fine outstanding citizen however you come across as a …… well nevermind… you are to conceited and arrogant to see your own flaws.. so never mind... you are welcome to point out mine as I know you will but guess what I am way ahead of you I know my downfalls.

Where have you cried?

The above post is you sniveling about being misrepresented?

Joe Bandy is Chris?

[1ofthechosen]

Originally Posted by JoeBandy

Well.... what a attitude to display.. I know you are trying to be demeaning with this post.. but hey that's ok you still believe them dang ol pants on that ol lady is a hell bound issue so you ok with the establishment. You an Eb gang up with the insults I am quite bored today as I "troll" this forum!!

I was joking, its hilarious you think I have a bad attitude though, means a lot coming from you. And I never said pants would send anyone to hell I just said what the scripture says"God said its abomination unto Him." But hey Joes opinion is much more important.

[Aquila]

Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa

Chris, do you know you can’t have any form of religion without legalism?

Legalism is an interesting animal. If I say that a woman should aspire to modesty and give her time to study, grow into the discipline, and examine herself, that's growing in grace. Now, if I tell her that if she goes home and puts on a pair of pants that she'll instantly lose her soul, that's legalism.

[Aquila]

Originally Posted by JoeBandy

You see this post brings out my opinion... Duet. 22:5 is about exactly what you stated here and not pants and dresses. But the same folks who rail about the dress code quoting this scripture ignore and/or misuse 1 Timothy 2:9. The author in Timothy is straight forward.. broided, gold ,pearls. This describes 99% of the "hairdo" I have seen in the UPC since 1972!

lol

Modesty includes proper covering and the absence of extravagance.

[JoeBandy]

Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa

That's wearing a belt to keep your pants up.

Why would a guy need a belt if he wore a dress?

Hmmmm… I just caught on to you EB.. you know the answer to this question. You are just arguing to argue.