Cult is short for culture. You have it by design or default. Often times the culture of a movement can be a good thing. The culture of a vibrant, relevant, progressive church is a GREAT thing. But the culture of a movement where everything is dictated by 1 or a group of leaders with no wiggle room can fall into the catagory of a cult. I don't consider the LDS a cult because I know too many of them and the ones I know their faith is solid in God. When a culture is led by the supremacy of a MAN and not the supremacy of God that qualifies. I don't think the UPCI is a cult either. Though in the LDS church and the UPCI church there are the extremes that border cultish. Having rules that dictate a heaven or hell path that is NOT FIRMLY founded on scripture is cultish. I choose to believe that most in the leadership of the UPCI are not cult leaders cause most of them really are led and used of God. Though I go to a UPCI church I am not a part of the organization and in its current state never will be. It boils down to teaching that is made a law in any religion that is outside the bible borders on cultish. But the deal-sealer to me is that the leader does not give credit to the Bible being the inspired word and they do not teach the supremacy of God's word. IMO
I agree. There is another poster on the AFF that does not believe in the fidelity of God's Word. I think that is the most dangerous position one can take. If you are not going to believe part of the Word, then what part? What page should you tear out and why? I think logic would dictate that the whole Word has to stand or the whole Word be thrown out.
I agree. There is another poster on the AFF that does not believe in the fidelity of God's Word. I think that is the most dangerous position one can take. If you are not going to believe part of the Word, then what part? What page should you tear out and why? I think logic would dictate that the whole Word has to stand or the whole Word be thrown out.
I have a friend that calls this a pitch and catch lifestyle. You catch or hold to what you want to believe and cast or pitch away what you don't. I think it is a shaky ground to be on as well, but the key question in my mind is did this person at one time or another aspouse that they did believe the infallability of the scriptures or have they not ever aspoused it. If this person has never seen the supremacy of the word of God they are not as bad off as if someone has seen and turned away, IMO. Often times those that have seen it then turned away almost never come back because the hate the word/truth with as much if not more passion than when they loved it.
__________________
"If we don't learn to live together we're gonna die alone"
Jack Shephard.
Points 4 and 5. I'd add friends to number 5 also... I knew one like that, when he left his town, he took about 1/2 the church with him... that's control, and that's a cult.
The heresy hunters are still with us. Only now, instead of stakes, they use their books and radio programs to destroy those they consider heretics.... I'm concerned that heresy hunting may be turning into leukemia because some cultwatchers seem more intent on destroying parts of the body than healing the body....
David K Bernard wrote an excellent article on a few years back:
Answering the Charge of Cultism
by David K. Bernard
Associate Editor of Word Aflame Press
In recent years a small but vocal group of opponents of the Jesus Name message have sought to label the United Pentecostal Church (UPCI) as a cult. How should we respond to this charge?
1. This charge stems from a small segment of the evangelical community … inspired by "ministries" who garner their financial support by making charges of this nature and who take their cue from the late Walter Martin, founder of Christian Research Institute and self-styled "Bible Answer Man." In many cases the charge is repeated by people who have had no personal knowledge of, or contact with the UPCI, and who have an inaccurate concept of the UPCI's beliefs. It does not come from any mainline Christian organization, nor is it the official position of any evangelical denomination. Trinitarian Pentecostal groups, who have the most contact with us, consider our views of the Godhead erroneous but still regard us as saved....
__________________ http://endtimeobserver.blogspot.com
Daniel 12:3 And those who are wise shall shine like the brightness of the firmament; and those who turn many to righteousness, like the stars for ever.
I agree. There is another poster on the AFF that does not believe in the fidelity of God's Word. I think that is the most dangerous position one can take. If you are not going to believe part of the Word, then what part? What page should you tear out and why? I think logic would dictate that the whole Word has to stand or the whole Word be thrown out.
No, logic says that one of the following is true: 1. All of the Bible is God's Word, or 2. Some of the Bible is God's Word and some is not, or 3. None of the Bible is God's Word.
The Bible itself does not spell out which books are to be included, so the scriptures that claim inspiration, even if correct, may be talking about a different set than the 66 we have today. For one thing, it's likely that Paul himself had only the OT in mind in 2 Tim 3:16. Also, some other books are quoted, apparently as authoritative, that didn't make the cut in some canons (Jude quotes the Book of Enoch, e.g.).
So, your statement that it's all or nothing may be true, but it's not logic saying it!
__________________
Hebrews 13:23 Know ye that our brother Timothy is set at liberty
David K Bernard wrote an excellent article on a few years back:
Answering the Charge of Cultism
by David K. Bernard
Associate Editor of Word Aflame Press
In recent years a small but vocal group of opponents of the Jesus Name message have sought to label the United Pentecostal Church (UPCI) as a cult. How should we respond to this charge?
1. This charge stems from a small segment of the evangelical community … inspired by "ministries" who garner their financial support by making charges of this nature and who take their cue from the late Walter Martin, founder of Christian Research Institute and self-styled "Bible Answer Man." In many cases the charge is repeated by people who have had no personal knowledge of, or contact with the UPCI, and who have an inaccurate concept of the UPCI's beliefs. It does not come from any mainline Christian organization, nor is it the official position of any evangelical denomination. Trinitarian Pentecostal groups, who have the most contact with us, consider our views of the Godhead erroneous but still regard us as saved....
I ran into one of those people one time, she spent about 2 hours in a coffee shop one night trying to convince me that I was in heresy when she realized what I believe. It was surreal.
I've read similar things (1-5) in Larson's book of Cults, I believe it's called.
They define cults as such. (The book includes Mormons, JW's, Islam, etc... in it's list of cults and summarizes their beliefs)
I would say 1-2 or even 3 are just plain false religions or false doctrines.
4-5 are definitely cultish.
Linear Mode
