|
Tab Menu 1
| Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun! |
 |
|

03-25-2013, 10:16 AM
|
|
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 801
|
|
|
Re: Geoengineering
Quote:
Originally Posted by ILG
...And then those who want the facts. I want the facts. That's all. And those are sometimes hard to find.
|
Amen. And the bigger problem is, even after deciding upon what the facts are, there can still be different ways to assemble the same set of facts. Eventually we should (or have to) depend upon the earned credibility of the "expert" community, meaning people who spend their whole lives focusing on a specific issue. That's why in the science world, "peer review" is such a big deal for establishing credibility of any claim. In Bible scholarship, for example, if 85% of lifelong scholars agree on a certain point of history, archeology, or textual origin, I'll tend to believe the 85%. Some people go with the other 15% because it suits their previous theology better. Fine with me--there are few "facts" that aren't themselves negotiable, but only when given better evidence.
__________________
_______________________________________
Deeply JN Apostolic: 1978-1999.
Happily agnostic/atheist 2011 to present.
Good news! The gospel boils down to, "Love me
or I will destroy you." --A god.
|

03-25-2013, 10:26 AM
|
 |
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 11,467
|
|
|
Re: Geoengineering
Quote:
Originally Posted by MarcBee
Amen. And the bigger problem is, even after deciding upon what the facts are, there can still be different ways to assemble the same set of facts. Eventually we should (or have to) depend upon the earned credibility of the "expert" community, meaning people who spend their whole lives focusing on a specific issue. That's why in the science world, "peer review" is such a big deal for establishing credibility of any claim. In Bible scholarship, for example, if 85% of lifelong scholars agree on a certain point of history, archeology, or textual origin, I'll tend to believe the 85%. Some people go with the other 15% because it suits their previous theology better. Fine with me--there are few "facts" that aren't themselves negotiable, but only when given better evidence.
|
I think we also have to consider the effect that systems have on people. Peer review can be worthless. For example, if you have a drug that needs to get certain marks to be passed into the public domain, if the drug company hires and pays the people who test the drug, amazing things can happen. This is a biased peer review. I am skeptical of anything and everything and I suppose you are too, looking at your sig line. After having been in a system where "peer review" is nothing more than the good old boys club.....that good old boys club exists everywhere in every segment. Truth can be very hard to find. All we can go by is our own truth, as small and untrustworthy even that may be. Fortunately, my salvation does not depend on my knowledge.
__________________
Those who say it cannot be done should not interrupt the people doing it. ~Chinese Proverb
When I was young and clever, I wanted to change the world. Now that I am older and wiser, I strive to change myself. ~
|

03-25-2013, 10:39 AM
|
|
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 801
|
|
|
Re: Geoengineering
Quote:
Originally Posted by ILG
I think we also have to consider the effect that systems have on people. Peer review can be worthless. For example, if you have a drug that needs to get certain marks to be passed into the public domain, if the drug company hires and pays the people who test the drug, amazing things can happen. This is a biased peer review. I am skeptical of anything and everything and I suppose you are too, looking at your sig line. After having been in a system where "peer review" is nothing more than the good old boys club.....that good old boys club exists everywhere in every segment. Truth can be very hard to find. All we can go by is our own truth, as small and untrustworthy even that may be. Fortunately, my salvation does not depend on my knowledge. 
|
Good points. Corruption does exist in the peer review world, and it's not a silver bullet. Still, the good ole boys system functioned well enough to put men safely on the moon, to win WWII in dramatic (scientist-driven) fashion, and to eradicate small pox, polio, etc. etc. And consider how we even KNOW about dishonesty or corruption in the system? Someone ratted out someone else, and told the public the truth. Problems everywhere! Human nature works in mysterious ways.
__________________
_______________________________________
Deeply JN Apostolic: 1978-1999.
Happily agnostic/atheist 2011 to present.
Good news! The gospel boils down to, "Love me
or I will destroy you." --A god.
|

03-25-2013, 08:07 PM
|
 |
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 11,467
|
|
|
Re: Geoengineering
Quote:
Originally Posted by MarcBee
Good points. Corruption does exist in the peer review world, and it's not a silver bullet. Still, the good ole boys system functioned well enough to put men safely on the moon, to win WWII in dramatic (scientist-driven) fashion, and to eradicate small pox, polio, etc. etc. And consider how we even KNOW about dishonesty or corruption in the system? Someone ratted out someone else, and told the public the truth. Problems everywhere! Human nature works in mysterious ways.
|
True dat.
__________________
Those who say it cannot be done should not interrupt the people doing it. ~Chinese Proverb
When I was young and clever, I wanted to change the world. Now that I am older and wiser, I strive to change myself. ~
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:50 AM.
| |