Did Jesus Wear Pants?

[JoeBandy]

Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa

No they don't.




So, if YOU were a pastor, you would tell women in the church to wear a dress because you could see their shape because of their jeans? Good job, and good grief

I have heard it done with my own ears and the dress cant be red because that's the color of a whore...………...

[JoeBandy]

Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa

How does she look in thee jeans Chris? Wanna go for a ride?

SO...…...to make a point you choose a picture of a woman who really wants to be a man.. kinda supports Chris's point about intent!

[Apostolic1ness]

Originally Posted by Amanah

Apostolic1ness, do you have a list of what women can/cant wear, can you share it here on the forum?

also, do you have a picture you can share from one of your church services so we can see.

funny, no I dont have pics and I dont have a list. I believe the scripture speaks for itself. If its for men then women should not wear it and if its for women then men should not wear it. I just listed the other items to show that we are inconsistent in where we draw lines.

[JoeBandy]

Originally Posted by Apostolic1ness

funny, no I dont have pics and I dont have a list. I believe the scripture speaks for itself. If its for men then women should not wear it and if its for women then men should not wear it. I just listed the other items to show that we are inconsistent in where we draw lines.

Being in UPC since 1972 I can totally agree with the inconsistency!!

[1ofthechosen]

Originally Posted by Amanah

****

When the Romans conquered Celtic Briton in the first century AD, they called the Irish "wild people." But as cultures mixed, Roman soldiers took to wearing a form of pants called braccae that resembled a pair of tight Capris, and were much more appropriate for cold weather climates than togas.

Braccae is the Latin root of the word breeches, a type of knee length trouser. Braccae, however, had adjustable hems and could be worn knee length or ankle length.


https://bellatory.com/fashion-indust...estern-Culture

There we go, called the same thing and not underwear but trousers. So we see through history what they were and that makes sense with the word geber also. So there you have it "breeches" just as I stated. All I did was read the word, I love how it interprets itself...

Thanks Sis for finding this btw..

[1ofthechosen]

Originally Posted by Aquila

If we consider the pants question in light of Christian modesty, I think we all can agree that women's pants are rarely modest.

I agree with this altogether. They are made to be alluring to their curves. They are made to be deceitful, designed that way. They are like make up for the backside really. Hence a good reason to stop wear them, not only cuz of Deut 22:5, but they are plain immodest..

You said a lot on that statement Aquila but you should've quit at where I quoted you.

[Aquila]

Originally Posted by JoeBandy

SO...…...to make a point you choose a picture of a woman who really wants to be a man.. kinda supports Chris's point about intent!

Bingo.

[Aquila]

Originally Posted by 1ofthechosen

I agree with this altogether. They are made to be alluring to their curves. They are made to be deceitful, designed that way. They are like make up for the backside really. Hence a good reason to stop wear them, not only cuz of Deut 22:5, but they are plain immodest..

Amen.

You said a lot on that statement Aquila but you should've quit at where I quoted you.

I just felt it necessary to point out the weaknesses of using Deuteronomy 22:5 as a proof text against women's pants and illustrate how regardless of how one interprets Deuteronomy 22:5, we can find quite a bit of consensus under the admonition to be modest in I Timothy 2:9, which is also solidly NT Scripture... avoiding any accusation of Mosaic legalism, questions, and conflicting interpretations that might be held about the text.

[1ofthechosen]

Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa

Pants, are male attire.

Dresses and skirts are female attire.

That is simple.

Deuteronomy 22:5 is dealing with men look like men and act like men, and women look like women and act like women.

The universal symbol for bathrooms.. Any 5 year old can read them.

[Evang.Benincasa]

Originally Posted by JoeBandy

I have heard it done with my own ears and the dress cant be red because that's the color of a whore...………...

Is that why you are no longer in church?