Hello TGBTG,
Thanks for your input.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TGBTG
Bro, Paul was not referring to tithe in 1 Cor 9. He was referring to the levites being allowed to keep the remains of the sin offering and burnt offering for themselves.
|
I agree that the immediate reference in verse 13 was to the altar offering, but the overall context of the passage speaks to something bigger than that. He was referencing the underlying principle of the Levitical system, which was the tithe.
I think it's important to keep in mind where Paul starts in the passage and where he ends up. The purpose, of course, for the passage is to answer "them that do examine me". Examine him about what? Evidently he had already established with this congregation the need to support the ministry, specifically support of him. And there were those who were questioning this. Why and who? I think if we answer the "who" it will give us an answer to the "why".
Notice that Paul begins to build his case for ministerial support using general principles of sowing/reaping that everyone in the church- both Gentile and Jew- would be familiar with. So, in verse 7, we see him using examples of soldiers, farmers and shepherds. All of these are workman worthy of their hire. But then he moves from these examples to ones specifically from the Law (vs. 8-10). Now, who in the church would have been familiar with these? Gentiles (as a general rule) certainly wouldn't, but converted Jews and God-fearers would have. So, it was the Jewish contingent that would have questioned his motives and standing for asking for support. Why? Because- according to the Law- only the Levitical priesthood would've been entitled to ministerial maintenance.
Paul could not rightly demand the Levitical tithe. He was of the tribe of Benjamin, not Levi. But, based on the underlying principles that he'd already cited, he COULD argue the case based on the law of sowing/reaping- specifically- spiritual sowing and carnal reaping (vs. 11).
Now, knowing he can't rightly demand a
Levitical tithe, he nonetheless makes his final appeal
directly to that system, because (as he did with the previous examples) he's basing his argument on underlying principles. The underlying principle of vs. 13 was the tithe. And so, IN LIKE MANNER (even so) those who preach the gospel among them were to be supported even as the Levitical priesthood was supported: the tithe. Supported with the Levitical tithe? No, just a tithe.
Quote:
Only the Levites were allowed to partake of the burnt offerings and sin offerings (Leviticus 7). In the same way, ministers of the gospel make their living from the support of the church.
But this has nothing to do with tithe.
|
I think you've just proved my point that this has EVERYTHING to do with tithe. All of that referenced in vs. 13 was to be brought to the altar specifically for the Levitical priesthood. IN LIKE MANNER, those who preached the gospel among them (the church) were to be supported.
Quote:
In the case of tithe, BOTH the general people and levites partook of the tithe of crops and produce (Deut 14).
Note: Tithe was not allowed to be currency. It MUST be crops and produce (Deut 14)
|
This would be germane if Paul had been arguing for a
Levitical tithe. But he wasn't, because he couldn't. What he COULD do was argue for a NT ministerial support system based upon the underlying principle of the former system.