Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The Fellowship Hall > Fellowship Hall
Facebook

Notices

Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #221  
Old 03-14-2013, 10:23 AM
Pressing-On's Avatar
Pressing-On Pressing-On is offline
Not riding the train


 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 48,544
Re: Bombshell- Considering going back to the UPC

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ferd View Post
my friend you are breaking a cardinal rule by not using the whole context of scripture. Acts 10 clarifies the point. EVERYONE who recieved the HG did so the same way. If I am writing a story, and I refer to an event multiple times I will not give all the detail every single time. Luke did not give every detail every time. BUT He gave plenty of detail and used very clear words.
Acts 10:
44 While Peter yet spake these words, the Holy Ghost fell on all them which heard the word.

45 And they of the circumcision which believed were astonished, as many as came with Peter, because that on the Gentiles also was poured out the gift of the Holy Ghost.

46 For they heard them speak with tongues, and magnify God. Then answered Peter,47 Can any man forbid water, that these should not be baptized, which have received the Holy Ghost as well as we?
Thank you, good grief, how obvious is that?
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #222  
Old 03-14-2013, 10:29 AM
Steve Epley's Avatar
Steve Epley Steve Epley is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 11,903
Re: Bombshell- Considering going back to the UPC

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ferd View Post
my friend you are breaking a cardinal rule by not using the whole context of scripture. Acts 10 clarifies the point. EVERYONE who recieved the HG did so the same way. If I am writing a story, and I refer to an event multiple times I will not give all the detail every single time. Luke did not give every detail every time. BUT He gave plenty of detail and used very clear words.
Acts 10:
44 While Peter yet spake these words, the Holy Ghost fell on all them which heard the word.

45 And they of the circumcision which believed were astonished, as many as came with Peter, because that on the Gentiles also was poured out the gift of the Holy Ghost.

46 For they heard them speak with tongues, and magnify God. Then answered Peter,47 Can any man forbid water, that these should not be baptized, which have received the Holy Ghost as well as we?
Thank you Ferd. It is so simple. And Jason I have been posting with some of these folks for 10 years. AND having been contending for the SAME views. AND have combated with many much more eloquent than those on here today. Never have ran sometimes just got tired and relaxed for a season but no one who has posted with me through the years will say I am chicken nor do I tip toe around any subject. As YOU acknowledge the pattern is there so in truth the discussion is over.
Reply With Quote
  #223  
Old 03-14-2013, 10:44 AM
revrandy's Avatar
revrandy revrandy is offline
His Eminance, High Potatohead Potatotate


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Stockton, California
Posts: 5,376
Re: Bombshell- Considering going back to the UPC

Ask yourself why Mary the Mother of Jesus needed to be in the Upper Room...

If anyone would have a pass to get into heaven it would have been her...

But yet she and Jesus's own brothers were in the Upper Room and had to be

filled with the Holy Ghost with the evidence of speaking in other tongues...

It is the way God chose to signal to mankind that He indeed was dwelling within them!...

You can't argue with the Bible...
Reply With Quote
  #224  
Old 03-14-2013, 12:10 PM
Steve Epley's Avatar
Steve Epley Steve Epley is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 11,903
Re: Bombshell- Considering going back to the UPC

Quote:
Originally Posted by revrandy View Post
Ask yourself why Mary the Mother of Jesus needed to be in the Upper Room...

If anyone would have a pass to get into heaven it would have been her...

But yet she and Jesus's own brothers were in the Upper Room and had to be

filled with the Holy Ghost with the evidence of speaking in other tongues...

It is the way God chose to signal to mankind that He indeed was dwelling within them!...

You can't argue with the Bible...
The ONLY Apostle who did NOT speak in tongues was Judas. The Gentiles recieved the LIKE(same in quanity and quality)gift they spoke in tongues and those who came from Joppa with Peter knew that recieved because they heard them speak with tongues AS IT FELL ON US AT THE BEGINNING.
Reply With Quote
  #225  
Old 03-14-2013, 12:17 PM
revrandy's Avatar
revrandy revrandy is offline
His Eminance, High Potatohead Potatotate


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Stockton, California
Posts: 5,376
Re: Bombshell- Considering going back to the UPC

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Epley View Post
The ONLY Apostle who did NOT speak in tongues was Judas. The Gentiles recieved the LIKE(same in quanity and quality)gift they spoke in tongues and those who came from Joppa with Peter knew that recieved because they heard them speak with tongues AS IT FELL ON US AT THE BEGINNING.
That's Bible...
Reply With Quote
  #226  
Old 03-14-2013, 12:23 PM
Jack Shephard's Avatar
Jack Shephard Jack Shephard is offline
Strange in a Strange Land...


 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: The Island
Posts: 5,512
Re: Bombshell- Considering going back to the UPC

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Epley View Post
The ONLY Apostle who did NOT speak in tongues was Judas. The Gentiles recieved the LIKE(same in quanity and quality)gift they spoke in tongues and those who came from Joppa with Peter knew that recieved because they heard them speak with tongues AS IT FELL ON US AT THE BEGINNING.
Quote:
Originally Posted by revrandy View Post
That's Bible...
Do either of you think if Judas had spoken in tongues he wouldn't have met the fate he eventually met?
__________________
"If we don't learn to live together we're gonna die alone"
Jack Shephard.
Reply With Quote
  #227  
Old 03-14-2013, 12:26 PM
revrandy's Avatar
revrandy revrandy is offline
His Eminance, High Potatohead Potatotate


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Stockton, California
Posts: 5,376
Re: Bombshell- Considering going back to the UPC

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack Shephard View Post
Do either of you think if Judas had spoken in tongues he wouldn't have met the fate he eventually met?
He could have repented as Peter repented...but choose to take his own life...

Judas sold Christ...

Peter denied Christ...

Either way I think Judas knew he was a dead man...the Sanhedrin wouldn't let him live with the illegal way things went down...
Reply With Quote
  #228  
Old 03-14-2013, 01:06 PM
rgcraig's Avatar
rgcraig rgcraig is offline
My Family!


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Collierville, TN
Posts: 31,786
Re: Bombshell- Considering going back to the UPC

Quote:
Originally Posted by revrandy View Post
He could have repented as Peter repented...but choose to take his own life...

Judas sold Christ...

Peter denied Christ...

Either way I think Judas knew he was a dead man...the Sanhedrin wouldn't let him live with the illegal way things went down...
Yet is was all in God's plan.
__________________
Master of Science in Applied Disgruntled Religious Theorist Wrangling
PhD in Petulant Tantrum Quelling
Dean of the School of Hard Knocks
Reply With Quote
  #229  
Old 03-14-2013, 03:48 PM
navygoat1998's Avatar
navygoat1998 navygoat1998 is offline
Repent and believe the Gospel!


 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Jacksonville FL
Posts: 3,090
Re: Bombshell- Considering going back to the UPC

Quote:
Originally Posted by Praxeas View Post
Spurgeon believed baptism was necessary.

http://godsbreath.net/2010/01/05/cha...about-baptism/
Prax I am not sure but I think it depends on what mood he was in.

Quote:
BAPTISMAL REGENERATION
NO. 573

DELIVERED ON SUNDAY MORNING, JUNE 5, 1864,
BY THE REV. C. H. SPURGEON,
AT THE METROPOLITAN TABERNACLE, NEWINGTON.

I find that the great error which we have to contend with throughout England (and it is growing more and more), is
one in direct opposition to my text—well known to you as the doctrine of baptismal regeneration. We will confront this
dogma with the assertion that BAPTISM WITHOUT FAITH SAVES NO ONE. The text says, “He who believes and is
baptized shall be saved,” but whether a man is baptized or not, it asserts that, “he who believes not shall be damned,” so
that Baptism does not save the unbeliever, no, it does not in any degree exempt him from the common doom of all the
ungodly! He may have Baptism, or he may not have Baptism—if he believes not—he shall be in any case most surely
damned! Let him be baptized by immersion or sprinkling—in his infancy, or in his adult age—if he is not led to put his
trust in Jesus Christ—if he remains an unbeliever, then this terrible doom is pronounced upon him—“He who believes
not shall be damned.” I am not aware that any Protestant Church in England teaches the doctrine of baptismal regeneration except one, and that happens to be the corporation which with none too much humility calls itself the Church of England.
__________________
Who art thou that judgest another man's servant? to his own master he standeth or falleth. Yea, he shall be holden up: for God is able to make him stand. (Romans 14:4)

Scripture is its own interpreter. Nothing can cut a diamond but a diamond. Nothing can interpret Scripture but Scripture" Thomas Watson.
Reply With Quote
  #230  
Old 03-14-2013, 07:08 PM
CC1's Avatar
CC1 CC1 is offline
Administrator


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 16,848
Re: Bombshell- Considering going back to the UPC

All of this doctrinal point is moving this thread off point. The real pertinent question is will Jason actually get off his rear end and visit the UPC church he has started a threat about possibly joining?

At this point the thread seems very premature and more of a tease than anything.
__________________
"I think some people love spiritual bondage just the way some people love physical bondage. It makes them feel secure. In the end though it is not healthy for the one who is lost over it or the one who is lives under the oppression even if by their own choice"

Titus2woman on AF
F


"We did not wear uniforms. The lady workers dressed in the current fashions of the day, ...silks...satins...jewels or whatever they happened to possess. They were very smartly turned out, so that they made an impressive appearance on the streets where a large part of our work was conducted in the early years.

"It was not until long after, when former Holiness preachers had become part of us, that strict plainness of dress began to be taught.

"Although Entire Sanctification was preached at the beginning of the Movement, it was from a Wesleyan viewpoint, and had in it very little of the later Holiness Movement characteristics. Nothing was ever said about apparel, for everyone was so taken up with the Lord that mode of dress seemingly never occurred to any of us."

Quote from Ethel Goss (widow of 1st UPC Gen Supt. Howard Goss) book "The Winds of God"
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
UPC BOMBSHELL!!! Will '93 Affirmation be overturned?????? Thad The Tab 53 07-24-2013 10:54 AM
(((Bombshell Bombshell!!! Attention All Gossipmongers))) PreacherV Fellowship Hall 18 12-16-2007 09:03 PM
***Bombshell: ALJC vs. NCO Battle Royale: The NCO/AWCF strike back *** SDG The D.A.'s Office 97 10-17-2007 02:48 PM
What would it take for you to get back into the UPC??? Carpenter Fellowship Hall 224 03-24-2007 01:14 PM

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by Salome
- by Salome

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.