Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The Fellowship Hall > The Newsroom
Facebook

Notices

The Newsroom FYI: News & Current Events, Political Discussions, etc.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #351  
Old 05-22-2007, 10:42 AM
Truly Blessed Truly Blessed is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,169
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rico View Post
TB, we have our own oil we can turn to, should that happen.
You don't have enough Rico. What you guys need to do is stop wasting so much oil with your extravagant lifestyles and reduce the demand for oil in the world.
Reply With Quote
  #352  
Old 05-22-2007, 10:46 AM
Chan
Guest


 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by Truly Blessed View Post
I am not a Bill and Hillary Clinton fan. I simply think it sad that even Christians are not able to acknowledge the good that someone does. Why does it always have to be that if a politician is of the other party everything about them is bad.
What good has he done that he wasn't forced into by a Republican Congress that kept him pushed toward the centrist he claimed to be when he ran for President in 1992? Welfare reform (a good thing) would never have happened if Congress hadn't pushed him on it and, even with that, he still didn't (to quote one of his campaign promises) "end Welfare as we know it."

Quote:
IMO there is no godly party in the US. One of the reasons that I am convinced that the days are numbered for the US is that it is "a house divided against itself". There was a day when politicians respected one another and tried to work together for the common good of the people they represent. Now it is constant bashing of one another.
The very concept of politics is a system of this wicked world and, as such, is part of that enemy of God we call "the world."

Quote:
I love the USA and would not want to be anything other than an American in spite of its faults. My father fought for America in North Africa during WWII. However, it is sad to see that many of the values for which he fought have been lost not because of the enemy without, but the enemy within.
So, being a citizen of the kingdom of Heaven doesn't mean anything to you?
Reply With Quote
  #353  
Old 05-22-2007, 10:48 AM
SDG SDG is offline
Guest


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: H-Town, Texas
Posts: 18,009
Welfare reform was part of a Gringrich-Republican led Congress and their Contract w/ America ... Clinton was left no choice.
Reply With Quote
  #354  
Old 05-22-2007, 10:49 AM
Rico Rico is offline
Shaking the dust off my shoes.


 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Nunya bidness
Posts: 9,004
Quote:
Originally Posted by Truly Blessed View Post
You don't have enough Rico. What you guys need to do is stop wasting so much oil with your extravagant lifestyles and reduce the demand for oil in the world.
Hogwash. Someone else already mentioned some of the reserves we have, which are huge. I didn't know about the one in Colorado, but I did know about the one in the Gulf and Alaska. Also, I won't be apologizing for the fact that America has more money than Canada, and as such can live a better lifestyle.
Reply With Quote
  #355  
Old 05-22-2007, 10:49 AM
Truly Blessed Truly Blessed is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,169
Quote:
Originally Posted by Felicity View Post
We are not anti-America -- just seeing how things are with our eyes open looking at the U.S. outside of its borders rather than the rather limited perspective of looking at it from INside.

You can't dismiss every negative statement or thought or perception about the US of A. There is some truth in some of the outsider perceptions and not just perception but actual happenings.

I don't think Canadians in general are anti-American either. THere's a great relationship between the 2 countries and it's been that way generally speaking for a long time - as long as I've lived for sure.
And with a surging C$ that is hovering at US$.92, that relationship is about to get even better. (At least in the shopping malls)!
Reply With Quote
  #356  
Old 05-22-2007, 10:56 AM
Chan
Guest


 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea View Post
I'm sorry Ferd ... but to act as if a President constitutional right to repel what he deems as attacks on America is INDEED VERY CONSTITUTIONAL.

Simply put the President has war powers and it's guaranteed to him by the Constitution and War Powers resolution of 1973.
But this War Powers Resolution is unconstitutional. By the way, here is the extent of the President's power with regard to the military, quoting from Article 2 of the Constitution: "The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States."

Now, notice the power Article 1 of the Constitution gives to CONGRESS:

To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offenses against the Law of Nations*;
To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;
To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years;
To provide and maintain a Navy;
To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;
To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;
To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress


*For more about what this is: http://www.wsu.edu/~dee/GLOSSARY/LAWOFNAT.HTM and http://www.constitution.org/vattel/vattel.htm.


Quote:
The purpose of the War Powers Resolution is to ensure that Congress and the President share in making decisions that may get the U.S. involved in hostilities. Portions of the War Powers Resolution require the President to consult with Congress prior to the start of any hostilities as well as regularly until U.S. armed forces are no longer engaged in hostilities (Sec. 3); and to remove U.S. armed forces from hostilities if Congress has not declared war or passed a resolution authorizing the use of force within 60 days (Sec.. 5(b)). Following an official request by the President to Congress, the time limit can be extended by an additional 30 days (presumably when "unavoidable military necessity" requires additional action for a safe withdrawal). [Wiki]
But it's still unconstitutional.

Quote:
Furthermore early Presidents took military actions w/o formal declaration from Congress.... Adams in the Quasi War ... and Jefferson in the War of Tripoli ...
Now, here's what really happened with the quasi-war:

In an effort to resolve differences with France that had accumulated between the two nations since the Treaty of Alliance of 1778, President John Adams dispatched a commission of three men to meet with French Minister of Foreign Affairs Talleyrand in 1797. After many delays, the American commissioners were approached by three intermediaries of Talleyrand, who demanded apologies for allusions critical of France made by President Adams and payment of a bribe of several million dollars before official negotiations could proceed. Convinced that further negotiations were hopeless the three commissioners returned to the United States, and President Adams released their dispatches to Congress, substituting X, Y, and Z for the names of Talleyrand’s agents. “I will never send another minister to France without assurances that he will be received, respected, and honored, as the representative of a great, free, powerful, and independent nation,” Adams declared. The American public was outraged at publication of the dispatches, and Congress enacted a series of measures to raise an army and authorize a Navy Department. It also unilaterally abrogated treaties with France, authorizing privateers and public vessels to attack French ships found competing with American commerce. Between 1798 and 1800 the U.S. Navy captured more than 80 French ships although neither country officially declared war. SOURCE

As for Tripoli, Jefferson was going against Barbary pirates that had been attacking American ships. France and Britain had the same problem with the pirates until those countries paid off the Barbary states.
Reply With Quote
  #357  
Old 05-22-2007, 11:01 AM
Truly Blessed Truly Blessed is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,169
Quote:
Originally Posted by CC1 View Post
They don't hate us for our "freedom". Where did you get that? They hate us because we are strong, powerful, successful, rich,etc,etc.

Freedom has nothing to do with it.

The truth is that many of the people who trash America would move here in a second if given the chance. That is one reason we have a significant population that does not want to assimilate and become "American". They want the ecocomic and political benefits of America while still hating America. This is a rot from within.
CC1, what you have expressed here is one of the main reasons there is such animosity towards Americans. When they travel the world they carry this very attitude with them. I've had many opportunities to observe Americans around the world and they are so arrogant and spend much of their time in other countries showing off what they believe is their strength, their power, their success, their riches, etc, all the while complaining about the local conditions and people.

Americans would be much more appreciated if when they travel to other countries they would show respect for the culture and people of those nations. It would benefit both them and all Americans if they would actually take time to learn from other cultures the invaluable insights into what has made them who they are as a people and nation.

Believe it or not, many people in the world are happy even though they do not have the affluence and privileges we enjoy in North America.
Reply With Quote
  #358  
Old 05-22-2007, 11:15 AM
Digging4Truth's Avatar
Digging4Truth Digging4Truth is offline
Still Figuring It Out.


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 10,858
Quote:
Originally Posted by Truly Blessed View Post
CC1, what you have expressed here is one of the main reasons there is such animosity towards Americans. When they travel the world they carry this very attitude with them. I've had many opportunities to observe Americans around the world and they are so arrogant and spend much of their time in other countries showing off what they believe is their strength, their power, their success, their riches, etc, all the while complaining about the local conditions and people.

Americans would be much more appreciated if when they travel to other countries they would show respect for the culture and people of those nations. It would benefit both them and all Americans if they would actually take time to learn from other cultures the invaluable insights into what has made them who they are as a people and nation.

Believe it or not, many people in the world are happy even though they do not have the affluence and privileges we enjoy in North America.
We interrupt this thread for the following announcement....

The opinions expressed by some neo-con Republicans on this forum and the actions taken by neo-con Republican administrations of late are not necessarily the thoughts or wishes of all (or even most) Americans.

We now return you to the thread in progress.
Reply With Quote
  #359  
Old 05-22-2007, 11:42 AM
SDG SDG is offline
Guest


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: H-Town, Texas
Posts: 18,009
Chan ... you arguments trying to deny the War powers ofa President ... is nothing new ... this debate has been raging for decades .... you can twist and turn it as you please ... the fact still remains .... THAT ONLY THE SUPREME COURT DECIDES WHATS CONSTITUTIONAL OR NOT .... AND TILL THIS DAY THEY HAVE NOT ... RULED IT UNCONSTITIONAL ....

furthermore my statements about the military actions of early presidents still stand ... as actions W/O formal declarations of war ... they are no different ... then the commercially based military action/decisions ... recent Presidents have made ....
Reply With Quote
  #360  
Old 05-22-2007, 11:51 AM
Digging4Truth's Avatar
Digging4Truth Digging4Truth is offline
Still Figuring It Out.


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 10,858
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea View Post
Chan ... you arguments trying to deny the War powers ofa President ... is nothing new ... this debate has been raging for decades .... you can twist and turn it as you please ... the fact still remains .... THAT ONLY THE SUPREME COURT DECIDES WHATS CONSTITUTIONAL OR NOT .... AND TILL THIS DAY THEY HAVE NOT ... RULED IT UNCONSTITIONAL ....

furthermore my statements about the military actions of early presidents still stand ... as actions W/O formal declarations of war ... they are no different ... then the commercially based military action/decisions ... recent Presidents have made ....
Has the Supreme Court addressed this issue?

If they did address it and found it to be unconstitutional for anyone but Congress to declare ware then what would be your view be on who has the power to declare war?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by Salome
- by Amanah

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.