Did we get the Swaggart scandal wrong? (V) - Page 5

mfblume · #41 09-08-2016, 08:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shazeep

if the accusations are baseless, then they should not be hard to refute, right? You guys realize the distinct comparison that can be made here to blaming the Russkies or whomever, anyone, rather than examining the emails and proceeding according to your own law? Houston, do i need to quote some Scripture to convince you or something? Is accusation manifesting humility here, or defensiveness? How do OPs examine themselves? Oh, snap, the same way Corporations do, huh.

you can either get defensive at restatements, or see that they are invitations to rebuttal. I'm not trying to put words in anyone's mouth; if one of my restatements is inaccurate then by all means point out how. I understand that they are likely just what i heard, not what you meant.

you have an open invitation to return to where your arguments were misunderstood, and i don't see anyone picking up that mantle. Are you saying you want to actually support some of your so far pointless rhetoric, Dordt, or what? Would you like me to support this charge, with a quote maybe, or do you just want to rest in "i am the victim here, and God will surely vindicate me?" You got an example of where i put words in your mouth?

Because i don't believe you, and i don't believe you even believe you.

I just laid out points where you lied. Are you even reading? lol

mfblume · #42 09-08-2016, 08:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dordrecht

This is crazy.
I don't have time for this nonsense anymore.

Maybe others do, but i don't.

He asks to point out his lies we accuse him of making, and we do, and he asks wondering why we're not pointing them out and substantiating them.

He wanted to dialogue so I said he has to stop his lies first. He asks what were lies, and when I point them out he acts like I never pointed them out.

I am done as well.

Total waste of time.

Dordrecht · #43 09-09-2016, 05:20 PM

Yup.

shazeep · #44 09-10-2016, 07:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dordrecht

This is crazy.
I don't have time for this nonsense anymore.

Maybe others do, but i don't.

ah, back to Righteously Indignant now, are we? that's what happens when you run out of rhetoric, and still can't defend your point. Any time you'd like to have a real conversation, it got dropped in like 5 different places, we can go back and pick it from from one of those. Til then you guys just be good little victims, cause that's all you got.

mfblume · #45 09-10-2016, 08:29 AM

No, we don't waste rime with lying posters. Keep twisting our reasons, for you already twisted our intentions and points. Run and don't dialogue when we post alleged lies and ask you to deal with our responses and explanations to them. You are posing yourself as a victim, ironically.

We didn't dismissed this as victims. We want you to deal with the lies so they can stop and we can talk. How is that running like victims?

shazeep · #46 09-11-2016, 08:01 AM

because you know i have not lied, and i have no need to lie as long as you post stuff like "love is for the confused" and "read some Paul and voila." Or, i take it back--you likely do not know, and have convinced yourself at this point that i did lie, do lie, am lying right now, etc. Also, all those places in the discussion where you terminated it was where you overwhelmingly defeated me, and anyone should be able to understand why following Paul is superior to following Christ now, because anyone who tells you differnt is obviously lost, as you have so masterfully demonstrated, and never mind the multiple areas that we don't need to rehash, because you have already prevailed there. You are the champion, and did not have to change your mind even a little bit.

I am the liar, the pagan, antichrist, and bow to your superior doctrine. You are just so amazing, and Jesus is surely doing cartwheels of Joy every time you correct one of His quotes. Or at least Dordrecht. Gee, and no one can figure out why no one wants to go to church anymore?

mfblume · #47 09-11-2016, 03:56 PM

You have lied. Simple enough. I never says love is for the confused. Come on and show me if I did. Like I said, you confuse the issue by twisting what we mean. I already caught you at that. If you sincerely think that's what we mean and it sounds odd for anyone to mean that, then quote it and confirm so we can clarify. Don't just assume. We never know what your referring to because you don't quote the statement. You need to learn to format and quote properly.

shazeep · #48 09-12-2016, 07:21 AM

we have about 5 threads on UD, and you have been promoting UD for the last year; why no defense of it there?

mfblume · #49 09-12-2016, 03:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shazeep

we have about 5 threads on UD, and you have been promoting UD for the last year; why no defense of it there?

What is UD?

lol

This is what I mean. I don't know what you refer to.

Ok just added to this post with this note... Universal Dominion? Is that UD? I have not gotten into that thread at all, so I don't know what it's all about.

So did you mean I have promoted UD? You did not address this thought to anyone, and since it is posted after my posts, I assume you meant my perspective. But Dodrecht did post, too.

shazeep · #50 09-12-2016, 06:12 PM