Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The Fellowship Hall > Fellowship Hall
Facebook

Notices

Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old 01-27-2010, 04:16 PM
BeenThinkin's Avatar
BeenThinkin BeenThinkin is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,206
Re: The Biblical response to ACTS 2:38

Quote:
Originally Posted by snicker1986 View Post
I'm going way out on a limb here...

I was very active for years in "mainstream" church, and unlike many in pentecost, loved it, had a fantastic experience, and found God there.

I married a Pentecostal woman, have joined her church, and now have experinced a new a more vibrant faith community (and "recieved the Holy Ghost" and spoken in tongues).

Here's where I step on dangerous ground with some on here..

I can say (for sure) that I had recieved the Holy spirit in my prior church life, in a quiet, demoninational, trinitarian church. We put God in a box so easily, don't we? I knew right then that God was in my life, and was empowering me. I felt and knew his presence intimately.

When I spoke in tongues after coming to this church (and I have many times since then), it did feel a wonderful closeness to God, but other than the vocal expression, it esssentially felt NO DIFFERENT than that which I had already experienced when I had a move of the Holy Spirit in my life. When you get the Holy Spirit YOU KNOW IT! You don't need something to prove it to you, and you dont need to prove it to someone else.

Tongues is a wonderful closeness to God, and a sign of his presense and love, but I think God meets us how and where we are. We're the ones who box him in, and tell each other he can only meet us in a certain place or way. That's kind of the same thing the early Apostles did with their assumtions that the Holy Ghost would only come to Jews, and not Samaritans or Gentiles. Aren't we thankful they were wrong??

Just my own personal experience, so takeit for what it's worth.

THANKS for speaking your heart. I think you're on good ground with this summary of your experience.

I have a question. I hope it's not too far off topic.

Has anyone on the Forum ever known of a Oneness Church or a Oneness Preacher requiring someone from a Trinitarian background to go to the altar and seek for the Holy Ghost, denying that the Holy Ghost that they supposedly received in a Trinity church wasn't the real thing?

It would seem to me that if God gave them the Holy Ghost, (and I believe He does), then why should we make ourselves judges and choose to not fellowship someone that God loved enough to give them His Spirit.

Just asking, Just "thinkin."

Been Thinkin
__________________
"From the time you're born, 'til you ride in the hearse, there ain't nothing bad that couldn't be worse!"

LIFE: Some days you're the dog and some days you're the hydrant!

I have ... Hippopotomonstrosesquipedaliophobia! The fear of long words.

"Prediction is very hard, especially about the future." - Yogi Berra

"I love the man that can smile in trouble, that can gather strength from distress, and grow brave in reflection." - Thomas Paine
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old 01-27-2010, 04:29 PM
pastorrick1959 pastorrick1959 is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 771
Re: The Biblical response to ACTS 2:38

if you receive the spirit ,, it will lead you and guide you into all truth ,,//yes they receive it and proof is going farhter in god ...not staying trinity , or baptiseing ,in father ,son ,holy ghost.
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old 01-27-2010, 04:31 PM
Jason B Jason B is offline
Saved by Grace


 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Decatur, TX
Posts: 5,247
Re: The Biblical response to ACTS 2:38

Quote:
Originally Posted by BeenThinkin View Post
Has anyone on the Forum ever known of a Oneness Church or a Oneness Preacher requiring someone from a Trinitarian background to go to the altar and seek for the Holy Ghost, denying that the Holy Ghost that they supposedly received in a Trinity church wasn't the real thing?

It would seem to me that if God gave them the Holy Ghost, (and I believe He does), then why should we make ourselves judges and choose to not fellowship someone that God loved enough to give them His Spirit.

I have never seen this. Which makes the question all the more relevant. Though there are some who demand that the trinitarians don't have the "real" Holy Ghost.
__________________
"Resolved: That all men should live to the glory of God. Resolved, secondly: That whether or not anyone else does, I will." ~Jonathan Edwards

"The only man who has the right to say he is justified by grace alone is the man who has left all to follow Christ." ~Dietrich Bonheoffer, The Cost of Discipleship

"Preachers who should be fishing for men are now too often fishing for compliments from men." ~Leonard Ravenhill
Reply With Quote
  #64  
Old 01-27-2010, 04:37 PM
Justin's Avatar
Justin Justin is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,395
Re: The Biblical response to ACTS 2:38

Quote:
Originally Posted by *AQuietPlace* View Post
Are we sure that these people had already believed on Jesus? It says 'certain disciples', but doesn't specify 'disciples of Jesus'. It sounds like they could have been disciples of John who had not yet heard of Jesus:

1And it came to pass, that, while Apollos was at Corinth, Paul having passed through the upper coasts came to Ephesus: and finding certain disciples,

2He said unto them, Have ye received the Holy Ghost since ye believed? And they said unto him, We have not so much as heard whether there be any Holy Ghost.

3And he said unto them, Unto what then were ye baptized? And they said, Unto John's baptism.

4Then said Paul, John verily baptized with the baptism of repentance, saying unto the people, that they should believe on him which should come after him, that is, on Christ Jesus.

5When they heard this, they were baptized
in the name of the Lord Jesus.
The focus is on verse 2:

2 He said unto them, Have ye received the Holy Ghost since ye believed? And they said unto him, We have not so much as heard whether there be any Holy Ghost.

Since they believed what? The Holy Ghost correlates with Jesus' Gospel, not John the Baptists.

It would only make since that "since ye believed" is specifically referring to the Gospel of Jesus.
Reply With Quote
  #65  
Old 01-27-2010, 04:52 PM
*AQuietPlace*'s Avatar
*AQuietPlace* *AQuietPlace* is offline
Love God, Love Your Neighbor


 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 7,363
Re: The Biblical response to ACTS 2:38

Quote:
Originally Posted by Justin View Post
The focus is on verse 2:

2 He said unto them, Have ye received the Holy Ghost since ye believed? And they said unto him, We have not so much as heard whether there be any Holy Ghost.

Since they believed what? The Holy Ghost correlates with Jesus' Gospel, not John the Baptists.

It would only make since that "since ye believed" is specifically referring to the Gospel of Jesus.
But at that point they had only been baptized unto John's baptism. Which makes you wonder if they had yet heard of Jesus.

Because he told them this:

"4Then said Paul, John verily baptized with the baptism of repentance, saying unto the people, that they should believe on him which should come after him, that is, on Christ Jesus."

And then, they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus.
Reply With Quote
  #66  
Old 01-27-2010, 05:36 PM
Sam's Avatar
Sam Sam is offline
Jesus' Name Pentecostal


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: near Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 17,805
Re: The Biblical response to ACTS 2:38

Quote:
Originally Posted by snicker1986 View Post
I'm going way out on a limb here...

I was very active for years in "mainstream" church, and unlike many in pentecost, loved it, had a fantastic experience, and found God there.

I married a Pentecostal woman, have joined her church, and now have experinced a new a more vibrant faith community (and "recieved the Holy Ghost" and spoken in tongues).

Here's where I step on dangerous ground with some on here..

I can say (for sure) that I had recieved the Holy spirit in my prior church life, in a quiet, demoninational, trinitarian church. We put God in a box so easily, don't we? I knew right then that God was in my life, and was empowering me. I felt and knew his presence intimately.

When I spoke in tongues after coming to this church (and I have many times since then), it did feel a wonderful closeness to God, but other than the vocal expression, it esssentially felt NO DIFFERENT than that which I had already experienced when I had a move of the Holy Spirit in my life. When you get the Holy Spirit YOU KNOW IT! You don't need something to prove it to you, and you dont need to prove it to someone else.

Tongues is a wonderful closeness to God, and a sign of his presense and love, but I think God meets us how and where we are. We're the ones who box him in, and tell each other he can only meet us in a certain place or way. That's kind of the same thing the early Apostles did with their assumtions that the Holy Ghost would only come to Jews, and not Samaritans or Gentiles. Aren't we thankful they were wrong??

Just my own personal experience, so takeit for what it's worth.
I've posted this before but it expresses how I understand some of the Spirit's work in us and agrees with your post

This is from pages 83 - 85 of a book titled Charisma Versus Charismania by Chuck Smith copyright 1992


Recently a young man came up to me and said, “I
accepted Christ several years ago, but I was never too
excited about it. I found reading the Bible uninteresting. In
fact, my mind would wander, and I couldn’t really concentrate
on the Word. I never really knew what it was to worship
God, and my prayer life was erratic. But since I was
filled with the Spirit a few months ago, my life has completely
changed. I have a great love for the things of God.
I can’t seem to get enough of the Word, and now I love to
fellowship with the believers. What a great change has happened
in my life since I was filled with the Spirit!”

This story, with variations, has been told to me hundreds
of times over by those who have found that there is
something more than just having the Spirit indwelling their
life at conversion. We do recognize that every born again
believer has the Spirit dwelling in him. Writing in 1 Corinthians
6:19, Paul declares that our bodies are the temples of
the Holy Spirit who dwells in us. He also declares in 1 Corinthians
12:3 that you cannot call Christ Lord except by the
Spirit.

The Spirit and the Believer
There are three Greek prepositions used in the New Testament
to designate the different relationships of the Spirit
to the believer: para, en, and epi. In John 14:17 Jesus said
to His disciples concerning the Holy Spirit, “Ye know him;
for he dwelleth with [para] you and shall be in [en] you.”
Here a twofold relationship is expressed: para (with) and en
(in). The Holy Spirit was with us prior to our conversion. He
is the One who brought us conviction of sin and revealed
Christ as the answer. When we accepted Jesus as our Savior
and invited Him into our lives, the Holy Spirit began to
indwell us.

But God has something more—the beautiful empowering
through the epi relationship. Note that this is what
Jesus was promising His disciples just prior to His ascension.
In Luke 24:49 He said, “Behold, I send the promise of
my Father upon [epi] you” or “over you.” In Acts 1:8 He
said, “But ye shall receive power after that the Holy [Spirit]
is come upon [epi] you.”

We read in Acts 10:44 that the Holy Spirit descended
“upon” the Gentile believers in the house of Cornelius:
“While Peter yet spake these words, the Holy [Spirit] fell
upon [epi] all of them which heard the word.” In Acts 19:6,
when Paul laid hands upon the Ephesian believers, the
Holy Spirit came upon [epi] them.

We read in Acts 8 that Philip had gone to Samaria and
preached Christ unto them; many people believed Philip’s
preaching of the things of the kingdom of God and the
name of Jesus Christ, and they were baptized. If there is
just one baptism (Ephesians 4:5), then we must accept that
at this point the Samaritan believers were baptized by the
Spirit into the body of Christ (1 Corinthians 12:13), and the
Holy Spirit began to indwell them. It is obvious, however,
that there was yet a further relationship to the Holy Spirit
to be received, for when the church in Jerusalem heard that
the Samaritans had received the gospel, they sent Peter and
John unto them that they might pray for them to receive
the Holy Spirit, for as yet He had fallen upon [epi] none of
them.

The Overflowing Life
When Paul came to the church in Ephesus and found
that the believers’ experience was lacking, possibly in love
or joy and zeal, he asked them, “Did you receive the Holy
Spirit when you believed?” If the full relationship with the
Spirit is attained simultaneously with conversion, the question
makes no sense. The question itself acknowledged a
relationship deeper and beyond the conversion experience.
What they were lacking was the epi relationship with the
Holy Spirit, for that is what resulted when Paul laid his
hands upon them in Acts 19:6: “and the Spirit came upon
[epi] them.”

Being filled with the Spirit adds new dimensions of
love, joy, and exuberance to the Christian life. If Paul the
apostle would meet you and begin to share the glories of
Christ with you, would he be apt to ask, “Did you receive
the Spirit when you believed?” God wants your life not to
just be indwelt or even filled with the Spirit. He wants your
life to overflow.
Reply With Quote
  #67  
Old 01-27-2010, 05:39 PM
Sam's Avatar
Sam Sam is offline
Jesus' Name Pentecostal


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: near Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 17,805
Re: The Biblical response to ACTS 2:38

In response to some questions about a person having the Holy Spirit or Holy Ghost or Spirit of Christ dwelling within them or being born of the Spirit and then a subsequent post salvation experience called a filling with the Spirit, or the Spirit coming upon, or a baptism in the Spirit, I recently posted the following on a forum:

Chuck Smith's premise in the book, "Charisma Vs. Charismania," is, if I understand him correctly, that there is an experience called salvation, or regeneration (being born again), or the birth of the Spirit which takes place when a person comes to Jesus in faith and repentance and calls upon the Lord for salvation. Also, at that time the Holy Spirit places/plunges/baptizes/immerses the person into Christ or into the body of Christ. This is what he is calling "en" or the Spirit within. He also states that there is a subsequent experience of the Spirit coming upon (epi) which can be separate from the salvation experience. This "epi" experience could be likened to being baptized in the Spirit or to being saturated with the Spirit or being plunged into the Spirit much like baptism in water. We some times use the term "one birth and many fillings" to describe the activity of the Holy Spirit in the life of a believer.

There are differences of opinion on just when the Apostle Peter was "born of the Spirit" but prior to His ascension Jesus told him and others to wait in Jerusalem until they were endued with power which He called a baptism in the Spirit. Most of us believe that happened 10 days later at Pentecost as recorded in Acts 2:1-4 when it says they were filled with the Spirit. Later, in chapter 4 we read again of Peter being filled with the Spirit as he spoke to the Jewish leaders (Acts 4:8) and again later when he was praying with a group of believers (Acts 4:31).

This pattern of a birth of the Spirit or salvation followed by a subsequent filling by the Spirit, or a baptism in the Spirit, or the Spirit coming upon, or the Spirit falling upon can be seen a couple of times in the Book of Acts.

The traditional date for the conversion of the Apostle Paul is January 25, AD 32 where he encountered the risen Christ outside Damascus. At this encounter he evidently believed Jesus was risen from the dead and he called him "Lord." Yet it wasn't until three days later when Ananias came into him that he was filled with the Spirit through the laying on of hands.

Also, Acts chapter 8 shows (in the opinion of some) this same distinction. In the winter of AD 31/32 Philip went to Samaria and preached Christ to them. The people responded by believing (receiving the Word according to Acts 8:14) and were baptized in water. So, this is seen as a salvation or born again experience when the Spirit came into them and placed/baptized them into the Body of Christ. Then some time later (we're not told how much time went by) , by the laying on of hands these believers received the Spirit or the Spirit came or fell upon them.

This is also seen by the way the conversion of the Ethiopian eunuch is recorded in some texts and quoted in some manuscripts. Notice that Philip would not consent to the baptism of the eunuch until he was assure that he was a believer. Then, subsequent to his baptism in water, the Spirit fell upon him:
"36 Now as they went down the road, they came to some water. And the eunuch said, “See, here is water. What hinders me from being baptized? 37 Then Philip said, “If you believe with all your heart, you may.” And he answered and said, “I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God.” 38 So he commanded the chariot to stand still. And both Philip and the eunuch went down into the water, and he baptized him. 39 Now when they came up out of the water, the Spirit of the Lord fell upon the eunuch and the angel of the Lord caught Philip away, so that the eunuch saw him no more; and he went on his way rejoicing. 40 But Philip was found at Azotus. And passing through, he preached in all the cities till he came to Caesarea."

Again, not to belabor the point.

The experience of Cornelius around 38 AD is seen a couple of different ways. While Peter was preaching, the sermon was interrupted by Cornelius and others speaking with tongues. Some see this speaking with tongues to be the new birth experience. Others believe that when these Gentiles believed and accepted the Word as preached by Peter they were born again (Spirit came to dwell within) and as they rejoiced in their newfound experience they were also filled with the Spirit or baptized in the Spirit or the Spirit came upon (epi) them.

Similarly in Acts 19 which probably occurred around October in AD 53. There are some things we don't know about just what happened there. We do know that when Paul questioned them they said they had not even heard that there was a Holy Ghost. This seems strange because the message of John the Baptist was that he was the one who would baptize in water but One who would baptize in the Holy Spirit would come after him. We do know that Paul explained that they should believe on Jesus Christ, they were baptized in water, and when hands were placed upon them the Spirit came on them (again, the epi experience) and they spoke with tongues and prophesied.

A separate filling is also found in the Epistle to the Ephesians. This letter was written to the saints and faithful in Ephesus so we figure they were saved and indwelt by the Spirit. Paul alludes to the Spirit being in them in verse 13 when he says "And now you Gentiles have also heard the truth, the Good News that God saves you. And when you believed in Christ, he identified you as his own by giving you the Holy Spirit, whom he promised long ago." A couple of chapters later in 5:17-20 he encourages them to be "filled with the Spirit" or to be "ongoingly filled with the Spirit" or to be "being filled with the Spirit" as it is some times said. I do not read Greek but I have been told that this exhortation to be filled with the Spirit is:
in the imperative mode,
in the present tense continuous,
in the plural number,
and in the passive voice.
So, it is an experience that is available, can be received, can be experienced more than once, and happens after salvation.

Sorry this got so long. It is not an attempt to argue, just to explain that among Pentecostals (both trinity and oneness) there are those who believe that the birth of the Spirit can be followed by subsequent works of the Spirit such as a baptism in the Spirit, or the Spirit coming upon, or the Spirit falling on, or being filled with the Spirit, or receiving the Spirit.
Reply With Quote
  #68  
Old 01-27-2010, 05:49 PM
Sam's Avatar
Sam Sam is offline
Jesus' Name Pentecostal


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: near Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 17,805
Re: The Biblical response to ACTS 2:38

John 7:39 says that the Holy Spirit was not yet because Jesus was not yet glorified. Some believe that this glorification happened 10 days before Pentecost and others believe it happened on resurrection day.

Some see the glorification of Jesus happening earlier that day.

Much earlier He had said to Mary, "Do not touch me, or do not cling to me, because I have not yet ascended to the Father." And then told her to notify His brethren that He was ascending to His Father and to His God (John 20:16). A few hours later that same day He suddenly appeared among them in an upper room and invited them to touch Him and handle Him to prove to themselves that it was really Him (Luke 24:39).

Some believe that between the time He prohibited Mary to touch Him and the time He invited them to touch Him, He had ascended to Heaven in His resurrected body and presented His blood to the Father.

Since He had died and rose again, the new covenant (which is of force after the death of the testator) was now in effect. His breathing upon them and saying Receive/admit the Holy Spirit was the breath of God flowing bringing into creation a new dispensation (the grace age or church age).

Although the disciples had been saved (even born again) under the Old Covenant, the marked the beginning of a New Covenant and they were now born again under the New Covenant.

50 days later the Church was empowered by the outpouring or filling of the Spirit or a baptism in the Spirit.
Reply With Quote
  #69  
Old 01-27-2010, 05:50 PM
Sam's Avatar
Sam Sam is offline
Jesus' Name Pentecostal


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: near Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 17,805
Re: The Biblical response to ACTS 2:38

There are differences among Christians, including Apostolic or Oneness Christians as to what happened in the upper room on that resurrection day (John 20) and what happened 50 days later at Pentecost (Acts 2). Some believe that when Jesus breathed upon those men there it was a picture of what would happen at Pentecost, that the breath/wind/spirit would come but that nothing like that really happened there in the upper room. Others believe that was the passing from one dispensation (law) to another (grace) and those men symbolized the difference when the Spirit was no longer with people but within them. It is believed by some that the upper room on the resurrection day was a maternity ward and then 50 days later Pentecost was a baptismal service when the church was baptized in the Spirit.
Reply With Quote
  #70  
Old 01-27-2010, 05:51 PM
Sam's Avatar
Sam Sam is offline
Jesus' Name Pentecostal


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: near Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 17,805
Re: The Biblical response to ACTS 2:38

Here is how John 20:22 reads in several different versions:
“Receive the Holy Spirit." NLT, NIV, NASB, Message,
Many other versions also read this way. Did they receive the Spirit at that time or was this a promise or prophecy of something in the future?

The Wuest expanded version says, "receive at once the Holy Spirit."
Malcolm Smith translates it as "Receive here and now the Holy Spirit."

The Spirit Filled Life Bible has the following note here:
The allusion to Genesis 2:7 is unmistakable. Now Jesus breathed life into His own. Some interpret this statement, 'Receive the Holy Spirit' as symbolic and anticipating Pentecost. Others understand the Greek to denote immediacy, in the sense of 'receive right now' and view the day of the Lord's resurrection as marking the transition from the terms of the old covenant to those of the new covenant. The old creation began with the breath of God; now the new creation begins with the breath of God the Son."

Some people use the following illustration:

1. Easter Sunday / The resurrected or glorified Christ / the inbreathed Spirit
2. Pentecost Sunday / The ascended or glorified Christ /the outpoured Spirit
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
N. Korea Response Jermyn Davidson Political Talk 21 05-29-2009 02:01 PM
What is your response to this? soldoutochrist Fellowship Hall 12 09-08-2008 10:46 AM
Acts 2:38 in first several chapters of Acts mfblume Fellowship Hall 2 09-01-2007 10:25 AM
Your TV Response Kutless Fellowship Hall 17 05-07-2007 08:06 AM

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by Salome
- by Amanah

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.