Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Steinway
An old friend, Tim Landry, wrote a quote on Facebook from an LSU student concerning praise for a history professor. "I had been taught to view the world with faithful acceptance, and he challenged me to look instead with unflinching intellectual honesty."
The more I thought about it, the more I realized that the Apostolic heritage that was handed to me relied on "faithful acceptance". Just submit and do and believe exactly how your pastor teaches. Don't question anything because then you are rebelling against authority and that will send you to Hell!
AFF and it's predecessors were the first opportunity for me to be honest with my feelings on Apostolic beliefs without the pressure of being labeled "rebellious"!
I think that there is a level of faithful acceptance that is healthy for you, but we must also rightly divide the word that is presented to us. We have a right to question things, especially things that aren't clear in the bible.
Which is more important? Faithful acceptance or intellectual research and honesty?
|
I agree with you and Timbo's friend on a fundamental level. We are on a journey. We must seek the proper path for ourselves. Guidance and input from others is invaluable, but it can also be misleading.
Of course, what some folks call "unflinching honesty" when it comes to historical analysis is often the act of "faithful acceptance" - just from a different "faith" then the one they had before.
Howard Zinn's
The People's History of the United States is an example and has been widely influential. It purports to be "unflinching intellectual honesty" but it really just comes across as Leftist propaganda. Zinn's myths are as fanciful as the ones we learned from Washington Irving and others.
Matt Damon has followed up Zinn's work by producing the series "The People Speak" which has aired on the History Channel. Though Damon actually achieves more balance than Zinn, both are propagandists pushing Leftist causes.
I wonder what view Timlan's quoted corespondent was looking at? Is such a question even warranted as a part of my own "unflinching pursuit of intellectual honesty" or do we just faithfully accept whatever is contrary to our past experiences in an effort to show that we've really "found the light" this time, for sure?