Chris Christie Getting Major Dem Donors

[n david]

SOURCE LINK

Gov. Chris Christie is cashing in donations from top Democratic fundraisers and other traditionally liberal donors across the country, even nabbing the support of a handful of rainmakers aligned with President Obama and Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel, a Star-Ledger review of state and federal records shows.

The checks are flying into the Republican governor’s war chest from all sorts of unlikely places — the hedge fund run by liberal billionaire George Soros, for example, and the politically progressive halls of the University of California, Berkeley.

Five executives at Soros Fund Management have chipped in a combined $19,000 to the governor’s re-election campaign, state records show. The donor roll includes Soros’ protégé and chief investment officer, Scott Bessent, who tends to fund liberal Democrats, and Sender Cohen, a partner at the hedge fund who more often favors Republicans.

John Doerr, a top Democratic fundraiser and venture capitalist in California, sent Christie the maximum $3,800 donation for the Republican primary this year. So did his wife. Federal records show the couple has given more than $1.2 million to national Democrats since 1997.

Tim Mullen, a Chicago investor who gave more than $100,000 to Emanuel’s campaign for mayor in 2011 and bundled from $200,000 to $500,000 for Obama in 2008, has also sent Christie a maximum donation, as has his wife Alice. Mullen was already a Christie donor in 2009, state records show.

Do. Not. Want. Christie for President 2016.

[Jermyn Davidson]

Christie will be a unifier that will take a common sense approach to conservatism in the context of a country that is unnecessarily divided.

He is our party's hope of winning the White House against an extremely popular Hillary Clinton.

Rand Paul and whoever will not be able to stop HC ticket.

Now if Christie and Paul were on the same ticket...

[crakjak]

Originally Posted by n david

SOURCE LINK









Do. Not. Want. Christie for President 2016.

The Demos are trying to buy him.

[n david]

Originally Posted by Jermyn Davidson

Christie will be a unifier that will take a common sense approach to conservatism in the context of a country that is unnecessarily divided.

He is our party's hope of winning the White House against an extremely popular Hillary Clinton.

Rand Paul and whoever will not be able to stop HC ticket.

Now if Christie and Paul were on the same ticket...

If he's the Republican Party's hope, then it's time for me to find a new political party. I'd rather have Hillary over Christie. At least with her you know what you're getting. Christie doesn't know which party he's in.

[Originalist]

Originally Posted by Jermyn Davidson

Christie will be a unifier that will take a common sense approach to conservatism in the context of a country that is unnecessarily divided.

He is our party's hope of winning the White House against an extremely popular Hillary Clinton.

Rand Paul and whoever will not be able to stop HC ticket.

Now if Christie and Paul were on the same ticket...

You just don't get it. We're tired of turn coats who sell us out under the guise of being "unifiers". We don't want to unify with the Democrats. We want to destroy them, as they are trying to destroy us now. This is war. Why don't the Democrats ever get lectured about unifying? Huh? If the establishment pulls this off, more Republicans will stay home in 2016 than stayed home in 2012.

[Jermyn Davidson]

Originally Posted by n david

If he's the Republican Party's hope, then it's time for me to find a new political party. I'd rather have Hillary over Christie. At least with her you know what you're getting. Christie doesn't know which party he's in.

You say this why?
What has he done to make you think that he has a Romney-like identity crisis?

Originally Posted by Originalist

You just don't get it. We're tired of turn coats who sell us out under the guise of being "unifiers". We don't want to unify with the Democrats. We want to destroy them, as they are trying to destroy us now. This is war. Why don't the Democrats ever get lectured about unifying? Huh? If the establishment pulls this off, more Republicans will stay home in 2016 than stayed home in 2012.

How is Christie a turncoat?

Why would you want to destroy any of your fellow Americans?

Why wouldn't you want a President that tries to unite?

Obama has tried numerous times to unite-- but the House Republicans are dead set against him and are at the point now where they don't even try-- oh and they have been at that point since 2010, and maybe even earlier.

"It's our goal to make Obama a one-term President."

It's not our goal to fix the economy, restore jobs, help the President end the war in Afghanistan, find a suitable resolution for Gitmo-- no we want to make the President look bad every chance we get and stop him from being effective in everything because we want him to be a "one-term President."


See how that plan worked?

[Originalist]

Originally Posted by Jermyn Davidson

You say this why?
What has he done to make you think that he has a Romney-like identity crisis?




How is Christie a turncoat?

Why would you want to destroy any of your fellow Americans?

Why wouldn't you want a President that tries to unite?

Obama has tried numerous times to unite-- but the House Republicans are dead set against him and are at the point now where they don't even try-- oh and they have been at that point since 2010, and maybe even earlier.

"It's our goal to make Obama a one-term President."

It's not our goal to fix the economy, restore jobs, help the President end the war in Afghanistan, find a suitable resolution for Gitmo-- no we want to make the President look bad every chance we get and stop him from being effective in everything because we want him to be a "one-term President."


See how that plan worked?

Please understand I'm not referring to literal "destruction" in a physical sense. I'm referring to destroying influence and any confidence the people might have in the Democrat Party. No, I do not want to unite with Obama. I don't unite with anti-american, communist loving fanatics. And I absolutely agreed with those who wanted to make Obama a one term President. Even now I wish him no success in his efforts to destroy America. I'm praying for his failure. He is an evil man and an enemy of our freedoms. Only those blinded by prejudice cannot see this.

[odooley6985]

Originally Posted by n david

If he's the Republican Party's hope, then it's time for me to find a new political party. I'd rather have Hillary over Christie. At least with her you know what you're getting. Christie doesn't know which party he's in.

What, other than him getting Dem donors, do you not like about him?

[Esther]

Originally Posted by Jermyn Davidson

You say this why?
What has he done to make you think that he has a Romney-like identity crisis?




How is Christie a turncoat?

Why would you want to destroy any of your fellow Americans?

Why wouldn't you want a President that tries to unite?

Obama has tried numerous times to unite-- but the House Republicans are dead set against him and are at the point now where they don't even try-- oh and they have been at that point since 2010, and maybe even earlier.

"It's our goal to make Obama a one-term President."

It's not our goal to fix the economy, restore jobs, help the President end the war in Afghanistan, find a suitable resolution for Gitmo-- no we want to make the President look bad every chance we get and stop him from being effective in everything because we want him to be a "one-term President."


See how that plan worked?

Please give me one example of where BO tried to unite. His idea of compromise is YOU give in to him NOT him give in to you.

[n david]

Originally Posted by Jermyn Davidson

You say this why?
What has he done to make you think that he has a Romney-like identity crisis?

His berating of Republicans in Congress for not passing a bloated, pork-stuffed, Sandy aide bill wasn't right. He should have blasted the members of Congress who were using the bill to push their pet projects and pass more spending.

Money is not given without expectations. These big-money, left-wing supporters of Obama and Emmanuel will expect something in return. I simply do not want the Republican candidate getting money from people whose politics and policies the party is diametrically opposed.

Originally Posted by Jermyn Davidson

Why would you want to destroy any of your fellow Americans?

Why wouldn't you want a President that tries to unite?

It's not that we want to destroy fellow Americans; it's that we want to destroy liberal politics. Obama's policies are dragging America down, and will turn America into a 3rd world country if not reversed. You simply cannot sustain the amount government welfare and support that Obama is doing. It won't last. It will cause a collapse.

Originally Posted by Jermyn Davidson

Obama has tried numerous times to unite-- but the House Republicans are dead set against him and are at the point now where they don't even try-- oh and they have been at that point since 2010, and maybe even earlier.

"It's our goal to make Obama a one-term President."

It's not our goal to fix the economy, restore jobs, help the President end the war in Afghanistan, find a suitable resolution for Gitmo-- no we want to make the President look bad every chance we get and stop him from being effective in everything because we want him to be a "one-term President."

See how that plan worked?

First, let's get what McConnell said correct and in context. You're spouting off typical liberal nonsense. Obama and his cronies have claimed that McConnell said this when Obama won the election in 2008, which is a lie. McConnell said this in an interview 2 years after the fact, in 2010.

Here's a portion of the interview:

NJ: You’ve been studying the history of presidents who lost part or all of Congress in their first term. Why?

McConnell: In the last 100 years, three presidents suffered big defeats in Congress in their first term and then won reelection: Harry Truman, Dwight Eisenhower, and the most recent example, Bill Clinton. I read a lot of history anyway, but I am trying to apply those lessons to current situations in hopes of not making the same mistakes.

NJ: What have you learned?

McConnell: After 1994, the public had the impression we Republicans overpromised and underdelivered. We suffered from some degree of hubris and acted as if the president was irrelevant and we would roll over him. By the summer of 1995, he was already on the way to being reelected, and we were hanging on for our lives.

NJ: What does this mean now?

McConnell: We need to be honest with the public. This election is about them, not us. And we need to treat this election as the first step in retaking the government. We need to say to everyone on Election Day, “Those of you who helped make this a good day, you need to go out and help us finish the job.”

Here's the much-quoted statement, though taken completely out of context.

NJ: What’s the job?

McConnell: The single most important thing we want to achieve is for President Obama to be a one-term president.

NJ: Does that mean endless, or at least frequent, confrontation with the president?

McConnell: If President Obama does a Clintonian backflip, if he’s willing to meet us halfway on some of the biggest issues, it’s not inappropriate for us to do business with him.

NJ: What are the big issues?

McConnell: It is possible the president’s advisers will tell him he has to do something to get right with the public on his levels of spending and [on] lowering the national debt. If he were to heed that advice, he would, I imagine, find more support among our conference than he would among some in the Senate in his own party. I don’t want the president to fail; I want him to change. So, we’ll see. The next move is going to be up to him.

For years this lie about McConnell and the Republicans wanting Obama to fail has been going around. It wasn't anyone in Congress who said that; it was Rush Limbaugh.

Your commentary at the end of your post is wrong. The Republicans haven't been trying to make the President look bad or oppose him just to spite him. Unlike you, being a Republican means something. It means you're for cutting spending; less taxes; fiscal discipline; protecting the unborn; etc.

You make it sound like Republicans should just rubber stamp anything Obama wants; because if they don't, oh those dirty scumbags are just doing it to make Obama look bad.

And you call yourself a Republican???