IAM has met WHOLEHEARTED!!!

[The Mrs]

Originally Posted by Old Paths

CC1

Thanks for your response and the spirit it was written.

I fully understand and appreciate it.

We may be poles apart, but you have aways been a gentleman, even when placing the daggar.

You are correct about the misconception for which I would quickly apologize if anyone thought that I meant that EVERYONE on AFF is a reprobate.

I do NOT believe that to be true.

(For more clarification read the post above)

I don't think this is the problem...

I think we are all aware that neither you, nor any of our posters, would think that EVERYONE at AFF were reprobate.

The problem some are having is that you would think this place has more than a few, as suggested by your 'many species' terminology. That would indicate quite a large group.

[Old Paths]

Originally Posted by The Mrs

I don't think this is the problem...

I think we are all aware that neither you, nor any of our posters, would think that EVERYONE at AFF were reprobate.

The problem some are having is that you would think this place has more than a few, as suggested by your 'many species' terminology. That would indicate quite a large group.

What more can I say?

[SDG]

Originally Posted by Old Paths

How dare you call me a con artist!

Shame on you.

This is over the line for an Apostolic forum.

I expect an apology.

WEAK ...

[Old Paths]

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

WEAK ...

NO

PERSONAL insult.

[The Mrs]

Originally Posted by Old Paths

What more can I say?

So, just to clarify...

You believe that this board is made up of many reprobate souls?

Or just several?

Or just a few?

Or just a couple?

[rrford]

Originally Posted by The Mrs

So, just to clarify...

You believe that this board is made up of many reprobate souls?

Or just several?

Or just a few?

Or just a couple?

In its present and past can one doubt there have not been a few reprobates who have wandered by?

[The Mrs]

Originally Posted by rrford

In its present and past can one doubt there have not been a few reprobates who have wandered by?

Bro. Ford...you have come at this question by answering that OP didn't mean that EVERYONE on AFF were reprobates.

And now you are answering that there have probably been a few.

Neither of these answers are the concern.

His statement indicated 'many'.

THIS is troublesome. To many.

[rrford]

Originally Posted by The Mrs

Bro. Ford...you have come at this question by answering that OP didn't mean that EVERYONE on AFF were reprobates.

And now you are answering that there have probably been a few.

Neither of these answers are the concern.

His statement indicated 'many'.

THIS is troublesome. To many.

I don't recall that he used the word "many" either. He said "evey species." Just how many are there? Actually, and truthfully, there is only one type of reprobate. But let's assume there are 4 types. That means that if one of each of those types posts here then "every species" has been represented. And those 4 are a far cry from "many" in the light of how many posters are members of AFF.

[rgcraig]

Originally Posted by rrford

I don't recall that he used the word "many" either. He said "evey species." Just how many are there? Actually, and truthfully, there is only one type of reprobate. But let's assume there are 4 types. That means that if one of each of those types posts here then "every species" has been represented. And those 4 are a far cry from "many" in the light of how many posters are members of AFF.

And a far cry that a few have tainted this forum to be as bad as the picture was painted.

This isn't a 100% conservative board - never has been implied that it was, but it sure isn't anything to be compared with Lois'.

[rrford]

Originally Posted by rgcraig

And a far cry that a few have tainted this forum to be as bad as the picture was painted.

This isn't a 100% conservative board - never has been implied that it was, but it sure isn't anything to be compared with Lois'.

Okay. Sorry ya'll. I just can't see the broad comparision you guys are seeing.
IMO there was a good bit of humor implied in his post, hence the smiley. I realize all don't see it that way. What really saddens me is that you folks actually think CS and I, in responding to OP's post, were saying this board was like Lois's. That is the only way I can perceive your responses.