A Relevant Holiness Message - Page 20

DAII · #**191** 02-28-2011, 10:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by triumphant1

I did end up watching both sermons. RM condemned the use of a rock song for a sermon illustration very pointedly. He said God was jeolous and "some things" (specifically the rock song) have NO PLACE in a worship service....condemning the preacher that did such a horrible thing.

The next week what was preached againt last week seems to be endorsed with laughter, and jumping, and clapping.....A James Brown spirit singing a James Brown tune in a worship service...

This has simpy made me curious as to how a pastor would address this contradiction...

I'm not uptight, nor am I fighting, nor am I condemning RM or GP. RM and I have been friends since we were teens. In the 90's we even preached youth camps together. I have no bone to pick, I'm just curious what his true response is in light of the two clips.

You forgot PUBLISHING.

notofworks · #**192** 02-28-2011, 10:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DAII

I think it's very feasible ... the rules change all the time within this movement.

Funny......and sad.

Pressing-On · #**193** 02-28-2011, 10:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DAII

What theology did we get out of 10 minutes of GP?

You and the blowhards ran with a 5 second clip ... and did not have the decency to use this wanton litmus test ....

PO ... you're an apologist and try to convince us you're the modicum of objectivity ... it gets old.

I've read quite a bit about Jeremiah Wright. Not just listening to that particular 5 second clip.

notofworks · #**194** 02-28-2011, 10:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MissBrattified

No, a lack of reaction would be due to an unchanging rule: respect your elders.

And if the elder had been Timothy Creel who let the s-word slip, we would respect him and let it go?

DAII · #**195** 02-28-2011, 10:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

I've read quite a bit about Jeremiah Wright. Not just listening to that particular 5 second clip.

Reading Mark Levin and Michael Savage doesn't qualify as reading.

MissBrattified · #**196** 02-28-2011, 10:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notofworks

And if the elder had been Timothy Creel who let the s-word slip, we would respect him and let it go?

I don't know about that, but I do know that my BIL accidentally said the "b" word during a sermon, and that was let go.

notofworks · #**197** 02-28-2011, 10:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

NOW,
I am just wondering what the whole message was about and possibility the part that Daniel edited didn't seem that important to him. I don't know. I'm just speculating at this point. Did any of you watch the total message?

I could never survive it, but the relevant points to compare are plenty sufficient and I don't need to watch the entire thing to know there is 1) A blatant contradiction taking place; and 2) Complete disrespect and mockery for an "elder", brother, fellow minister.

DAII · #**198** 02-28-2011, 10:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notofworks

I could never survive it, but the relevant points to compare are plenty sufficient and I don't need to watch the entire thing to know there is 1) A blatant contradiction taking place; and 2) Complete disrespect and mockery for an "elder", brother, fellow minister.

10 minutes of audio germane to the topic ... which is a contradiction concerning being "relevant"

... if she wants to hear him read somebody's mail ... it's all there ... I painfully listened to the whole thing as well.

It's more like posturing by playing the "I'm being objective and reasonable" ... "but I'd never listen to 5 second clip without taking Rush Limbaugh's word for it" card

notofworks · #**199** 02-28-2011, 10:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MissBrattified

I don't know about that, but I do know that my BIL accidentally said the "b" word during a sermon, and that was let go.

I do know about it, I was there, and I was on the platform with the CLC choir. Timothy Creel said ONE WORD and his career was toast.

triumphant1 · #**200** 02-28-2011, 10:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

NOW,
I am just wondering what the whole message was about and possibility the part that Daniel edited didn't seem that important to him. I don't know. I'm just speculating at this point. Did any of you watch the total message?

Yes I did watch both sermons. In the context of using a rock song or not...the edited clips are in context as far as I can tell.

RM condemned the use of rock songs for sermon illustrations and made another preacher look really bad in front of his congregation....one week later GP does exactly what RM preached against with the congregations approval...

No shafty editing....it happened just like that.