QUESTION: DId only 72 or 225 join WPF??????? - Page 13

embonpoint · #**121** 02-06-2008, 09:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dizzyde

Problem, at least one of the names on the website has not joined, and I don't think even went to Tulsa.

So that means there are only 71? What is your point?

There are obviously more than 72 ministers signed up for the WPF. Whether the UPCI folks like it or not.

dizzyde · #**122** 02-06-2008, 09:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by embonpoint

So that means there are only 71? What is your point?

There are obviously more than 72 ministers signed up for the WPF. Whether the UPCI folks like it or not.

My point is that you are making the assumption that the information on the website is 100% accurate. It would seem that is not the case.

#**123** 02-06-2008, 09:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by embonpoint

So that means there are only 71? What is your point?

There are obviously more than 72 ministers signed up for the WPF. Whether the UPCI folks like it or not.

Nothing is obvious with this group. I know for a fact at least three of the names on the website actually asked for their names to be removed from the list. They had never given permission for their names to be used and were quite upset that this happened.

What does that tell you about this group?

embonpoint · #**124** 02-06-2008, 09:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dizzyde

My point is that you are making the assumption that the information on the website is 100% accurate. It would seem that is not the case.

I think you assume what my assumptions are.:biggrin:

I don't assume that the site is 100% correct. Lets assume it is only 90% correct that means you only have to come up with another 16 or 17 names other than those listed, again a pretty safe assumption based on the churches of the 56 or so that would still be associated.

I do admit to making assumptions. Just not the one you assumed.

embonpoint · #**125** 02-06-2008, 09:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MissionsJD

Nothing is obvious with this group. I know for a fact at least three of the names on the website actually asked for their names to be removed from the list. They had never given permission for their names to be used and were quite upset that this happened.

What does that tell you about this group?

Which 3?

NW Pastor · #**126** 02-06-2008, 09:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by embonpoint

Which 3?

Well, it's probably a secret, just like those who have joined.

embonpoint · #**127** 02-06-2008, 09:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MissionsJD

Nothing is obvious with this group. I know for a fact at least three of the names on the website actually asked for their names to be removed from the list. They had never given permission for their names to be used and were quite upset that this happened.

What does that tell you about this group?

You tell me!

That they learned from sitting at the feet of the best?

NW Pastor · #**128** 02-06-2008, 09:55 PM

Maybe that's why we don't know who did join.

NW Pastor · #**129** 02-06-2008, 09:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by embonpoint

You tell me!

That they learned from sitting at the feet of the best?

Exactly whose feet do the leadership of Tulsa sit at?

embonpoint · #**130** 02-06-2008, 09:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NW Pastor

Well, it's probably a secret, just like those who have joined.

I know. Can you believe the audacity of this group. It has been 2 weeks since the meeting and they haven't published a directory yet. Haven't even posted names on the forums.

Don't they know or care that the masses are waiting.