Quote:
Originally Posted by jfrog
yes,but you do admit it was an actual language in all cases right?
|
Actually don't answer that. I'll take a page from the Pentecostal Playbook.
Since those in the
Acts 2:4 account spoke in actual languages and there is no evidence to show that the others in
Acts 10 and
Acts 19 did not then we must believe that they also spoke in actual languages since that is the only pattern we have of people receiving the Holy Ghost.
So because actual languages were spoken in every account of someone getting the Holy Ghost then I think we can resolve this dispute by getting 10 tape recordings of 10 apostolics speaking in tongues. We will pay a linguist to examine these and if he can match them to an actual language then there is the proof.
Threaded Mode
