A Relevant Holiness Message

[MissBrattified]

http://www.eff.org/issues/ip-and-fre...ciples-usergen

"Copyright owners are within their rights to pursue nontransformative verbatim copying of their copyrighted materials online. However, where copyrighted materials are employed for purposes of comment, criticism, reporting, parody, satire, or scholarship, or as the raw material for other kinds of creative and transformative works, the resulting work will likely fall within the bounds of fair use.
But a commitment to accommodating "fair use" alone is not enough. Because the precise contours of the fair use doctrine can be difficult for non-lawyers to discern, creators, service providers, and copyright owners alike will benefit from a more easily understood and objectively ascertainable standard.

Accordingly, content owners should, as a general matter, avoid issuing DMCA or other informal takedown notices for uses of their content that constitute fair uses or that are noncommercial, creative, and transformative in nature.2"

I don't think you have anything to fear.

[DAII]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OFbDNyugmFk

[notofworks]

Originally Posted by Michael Phelps

I hope I'm wrong, but my guess is that if this would have been a trinitarian preacher on TBN, there wouldn't be nearly as much mercy being extended.

You are a million percent WRONG. And what does trinitarian have to do with it?

[notofworks]

Originally Posted by MissBrattified

Listen, I can understand getting worked up over false doctrine or immorality; I don't see the point in ripping someone to shreds over their style of delivery. I can even understand picking on RM a bit because of the contradiction on his platform--but even that doesn't make RM a bad person. It might make him a conflicted or inconsistent person.

The fact that Juanita Bynum and Benny Hinn aren't defended is irrelevant since they aren't all the popular with many of their trinitarian counterparts, either. Furthermore, I have a problem with Juanita Bynum because I'm a woman and I expect other women to behave in a feminine manner. It has zero to do with her not being "oneness."

I remember a thread awhile back where NOW criticized Mark Driscoll because of his "delivery" (yelling during a sermon) and I defended him.

That said, I'm sure we all tend to defend people in our own ranks, whether that be oneness or not. I grew up around a lot of preachers who delivered the Gospel with less than finesse, to put it mildly, yet people were still saved. Sometimes preaching IS foolishness, but God tends to use it anyway.

It wasn't really the yelling, it was the piety. He was treating the congregants like dirt. It reminded me of Western District Youth Conventions I used to go to.

And when the bible refers to the foolishness of preaching, it has nothing to do with foolish preaching.

[MissBrattified]

Originally Posted by notofworks

It wasn't really the yelling, it was the piety. He was treating the congregants like dirt. It reminded me of Western District Youth Conventions I used to go to.

And when the bible refers to the foolishness of preaching, it has nothing to do with foolish preaching.

Regardless of the specifics about MD, I'm not opposed to defending a trinitarian. That's my only point.

[notofworks]

Originally Posted by MissBrattified

Regardless of the specifics about MD, I'm not opposed to defending a trinitarian. That's my only point.

Oh, ok. I don't know when trinitarian entered into this. Did I say something?

[DAII]

Originally Posted by notofworks

Oh, ok. I don't know when trinitarian entered into this. Did I say something?

No.

[notofworks]

Originally Posted by DAII

No.

[MissBrattified]

No, Daniel did. And he had a point, but when I thought about it, I decided the point wasn't about ME.

[Hoovie]

Yawn