Way To Make Us Proud Ms. Angle!

[coadie]

Originally Posted by Twisp

Hold on, you are saying that we know life did not rise from a combination of materials around it?

So now you are saying that life came from nothing? LOL, I have never seen someone switch positions so dramatically in a thread before. You are either very tired or very high.

That is called abiogenesis. You and no one else has ever seen life spontaneously generate from non life and on top of that, become self replicating.

So now you are saying that life came from nothing

That is a typical attempt to misquote me. That is a dishonest tactic on your part.

Typical liberal deception. like claim the separation of church and state clauses.

[coadie]

Originally Posted by Sam

It is called bloodless jihad.
The idea is to have a large enough Muslim population in a city or neighborhood so that sharia law becomes the local law. It is my understanding that there are areas in Europe where local areas are under sharia law.

"It means all the world to us to know that there are prayer circles out there and people who are keeping the spirits clean around us," First Lady Michelle Obama said on the "Tom Joyner Morning Show" today.

The Royal family is giving some spiritual; covering now.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/vid...out_there.html

[Twisp]

Originally Posted by coadie

That is called abiogenesis. You and no one else has ever seen life spontaneously generate from non life and on top of that, become self replicating.



That is a typical attempt to misquote me. That is a dishonest tactic on your part.

Typical liberal deception. like claim the separation of church and state clauses.

I never said that life came from nothing.

You said that we are scientifically advanced enough to know that life did not come from the materials around it. The only other option is that you believe life came from nothing.

Your words, not mine.

[coadie]

Originally Posted by Twisp

I never said that life came from nothing.

You said that we are scientifically advanced enough to know that life did not come from the materials around it. The only other option is that you believe life came from nothing.

Your words, not mine.

False dichotomy. Matter energy and life came from a Creator.

Weasels create false dichotomies when they are desparate.

Richard Dawkins, the robust atheist/evolutiionist posits panspermia.

More of your dishonest ways.

. spontaneously generate

That is called abiogenesis. You and no one else has ever seen life spontaneously generate from non life and on top of that, become self replicating.

Twisp you are a very deceiptfull person. You are dishonest by way of trying to twist what people post and misquote people.

You can't stop it when we call you on it.

Originally Posted by coadie
We are advanced enough to know it didn't happen. Oxygen and Uv light kill these crude amino acid peptide chains and nucleotides.

[Twisp]

Originally Posted by coadie

False dichotomy. Matter energy and life came from a Creator.

Weasels create false dichotomies when they are desparate.

Richard Dawkins, the robust atheist/evolutiionist posits panspermia.

More of your dishonest ways.

. spontaneously generate



Twisp you are a very deceiptfull person. You are dishonest by way of trying to twist what people post and misquote people.

You can't stop it when we call you on it.

Since you aren't denying your belief that life came from nothing, you must believe it.

Tell us, since you believe that life came from nothing, how did it occur?

[coadie]

Originally Posted by Twisp

Since you aren't denying your belief that life came from nothing, you must believe it.

Tell us, since you believe that life came from nothing, how did it occur?

You can't stop lying.

False dichotomy. Matter energy and life came from a Creator.

I answered in the previous post. You are behaving very stupidly for some reason.

And immediately after calling your sleazy mis quoting misconduct, you do it again.

Your moral issues will give you a lot of problems.

False dichotomy. Matter energy and life came from a Creator.

as previously posted

[Twisp]

Originally Posted by coadie

You can't stop lying.



I answered in the previous post. You are behaving very stupidly for some reason.

And immediately after calling your sleazy mis quoting misconduct, you do it again.

Your moral issues will give you a lot of problems.



as previously posted

Well, that is not a very testable theory, is it?

Seeing as how you required that in a previous post from my thinking of the origins of life, why would you, in turn, believe something that was even more untestable?

It is far easier to test the theory that life sprung from materials behind it than to test that a man was literally formed from the dust of the earth, and that woman was formed from his rib and dust from the earth.

What, you only want to test other theories, not your own?

[coadie]

Originally Posted by Twisp

Well, that is not a very testable theory, is it?

Seeing as how you required that in a previous post from my thinking of the origins of life, why would you, in turn, believe something that was even more untestable?

It is far easier to test the theory that life sprung from materials behind it than to test that a man was literally formed from the dust of the earth, and that woman was formed from his rib and dust from the earth.

What, you only want to test other theories, not your own?

So now that I exposed your misquoting misconduct you want to talk about tests?

Quote:
False dichotomy. Matter energy and life came from a Creator.

You are not educated in science even at the juvenile level. In experiments, they must be replicatable. Non recurring events that are unique can't be replicated. There are millions of events claimed in evolution theory that have never been replicated and can't be but we rely on faith. Faith that stands against both odds and reason.

Evolution theory is NOT testilble as an explanation of the origin of life because no one was there.

[Twisp]

Originally Posted by coadie

So now that I exposed your misquoting misconduct you want to talk about tests?


You are not educated in science even at the juvenile level. In experiments, they must be replicatable. Non recurring events that are unique can't be replicated. There are millions of events claimed in evolution theory that have never been replicated and can't be but we rely on faith. Faith that stands against both odds and reason.

Evolution theory is NOT testilble as an explanation of the origin of life because no one was there.

You didn't expose any misquotes of mine, because I did not misquote anything, lol. I simply ignored your inane accusations and tried to get to the heart of the issue.

Since you are apparently "educated" in science so much, perhaps we should test out your creation theory on yourself. Let's put you to sleep, take one of your ribs, and try to make a woman out of it.

I don't think anyone would object, lol.

[coadie]

Originally Posted by Twisp

You didn't expose any misquotes of mine, because I did not misquote anything, lol. I simply ignored your inane accusations and tried to get to the heart of the issue.

Since you are apparently "educated" in science so much, perhaps we should test out your creation theory on yourself. Let's put you to sleep, take one of your ribs, and try to make a woman out of it.

I don't think anyone would object, lol.

It would blow your mind if you knew how much education and experience I have. Your joke about the rib reminds me of harvesting bone and freezing it so we could use it for L4, L5 fusions and not put a patient thru the pain of harvesting a donor bone from the ileac crest.