Quote:
Originally Posted by crakjak
You have an opinion about the "Cons", however the truth is they were as difficult and "mean" as those you accuse. I have debated with them for years and tried to always be kind and respectful, and did make "friendly" with most of them. Because I was not offended by their strong opinions, even when they were mean. I have been where they are and therefore I understand the passion, but when I was honest with myself and studied the scriptures and history, I found that we had never been expose to the "whole" story.
So, if you want to ask questions, just accept folks answers as their opinion and don't get "sensitive", because that just doesn't fly here. We have been where you are, but you likely have not walked in our shoes, nor been were we are.
And BTW, my answers would all be "NO", except for the last one and it would be "YES". Read 1 Tim. 4:10, and you will find a very strong statement of why my answers are as stated. |
No one is exempt from human tendancies so in that sense, I'll agree that both sides say things they shouldn't. But from what I've seen, when a person from the traditional apostolic heritage expresses that a person isn't right with God because of their lack of holding true to The Message, they're called mean. I don't see that as mean, I just see that as expressing truth. But when I express my thoughts here I"m mocked and made fun of, called crazy, a baby, laughed at. That's personal and I don't see the traditional apostolics getting personal at least in my exprience.
Threaded Mode
