Quote:
Originally Posted by deacon blues
Mitt said he consulted with his wife about women's issues and Rosen basically was saying she couldn't know what women care about since she hasn't worked a day I her life. But since Rosen feels that liberals like her know what women care about and women like Ann don't, it's preposterous to think that what Ann has to say to Mitt will help him grasp what women care about. The hypocrisy is that you have to assume that Ann isn't a real woman and women like her aren't and their opinions don't count. It's also hypocritical to believe that wealth somehow prevents struggle, fear, difficulties, sickness and uncertainty. It doesn't. The challenges in life might be different based on economics, but life is no respecter of persons when it comes to heartache, disappointment, loneliness and sadness.
|
The Romney camp jumped on that deal in a matter of minutes. As an opportunist he saw he could pull out a narrative to garner sympathy toward himself, using his wife, because he doesn't have the women's vote.
You can be fooled by that, but I am not. The Democrats knew they needed to do damage control because Ann is more likeable than her husband and they couldn't afford to weigh in on this.
It was a clever maneuver, I will give him that. But, since he doesn't mind lying about his fellow candidates, I'm sure anything is kosher for Romney.
Rosen was correct, Ann has no clue what it feels like to struggle economically. She wasn't talking about her children or her motherhood. The right media grabbed the opportunity as well, because it works regardless of substance.
I have no idea what this has to do with Trayvon or Zimmerman.
Threaded Mode
