Anger + Sadness = RAGE

[deacon blues]

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

She wasn't speaking about children, she was speaking of the economic challenge. And there is some merit in that conversation. Motherhood is time honored, no doubt about that. But to say that Ann Romney has any experience or inkling of what it feels like to struggle economically is the argument. It's not about her children or her motherhood.

And, really, this topic should have it's own thread.

Mitt said he consulted with his wife about women's issues and Rosen basically was saying she couldn't know what women care about since she hasn't worked a day I her life. But since Rosen feels that liberals like her know what women care about and women like Ann don't, it's preposterous to think that what Ann has to say to Mitt will help him grasp what women care about. The hypocrisy is that you have to assume that Ann isn't a real woman and women like her aren't and their opinions don't count. It's also hypocritical to believe that wealth somehow prevents struggle, fear, difficulties, sickness and uncertainty. It doesn't. The challenges in life might be different based on economics, but life is no respecter of persons when it comes to heartache, disappointment, loneliness and sadness.