Quote:
Originally Posted by 1ofthechosen
I was clear it was anything in the design long or short was made for men. We have scripture of God initiating the making of them. And then cultures through histories, even keeping the same name for them. So we don't have to worry about where the design came from, it came directly from God (and got scripture to prove it..) , and we see through history they were always intended for men. So they weren't just undergarments, as y'all tried to claim, you and Costeon were saying "these are just male undergarments like boxers." Well according to history that isn't true.
Y'all can deny hard evidence all you want, but should I follow your opinion or what is clearly seen from scripture and history?
Hey maybe I should share with you this ground breaking piece of evidence. Any 5 year old can read it. This is the universal sign for bathroom.. Hey and it even says Feman for female, but she still put a dress on. Good for her!  |
I wouldn't take theology from bathroom signs. Besides, her skirt is too short.
But seriously. I do see your point. Regardless of what women might wear, it is culturally accepted throughout the world that the basic attire of a well mannered and modest woman includes a dress or skirt.
However, there are other elements to consider. They say that the sun never set on the British Empire. The British colonized most of the known world. With them they brought Western values, styles of dress, mannerisms, and customs. Many cultures had norms forced upon them that were alien to their. Add to the mix France, Portugal, Spain, and other nations who colonized the known world importing Western culture and styles of dress.
My point is, these signs reflect styles of dress that were imported to most of the known world. In many cases, they do not always reflect the indigenous norms as it relates to gender.
But, nevertheless, I do see your point.
Threaded Mode
