Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dean
Well from the cheap seats here it appears to me that this thread can be summed up like this - the source that was referred to wasn't quite the source the other source was. But that would really depend on if the source the source knew was really a genuine source. But the other source says that the source isn't a source making the fake source's source not quite the source the source was supposed to be.
That would depend on how reliable the source of the true source's source after all. I bet the source is in trouble if the real source is leaking information from an unreliable source or the unrealiable source of a reliable source.
I bet Hazelwood frowns on sources that become a source instead of something with more integrity. That is dependent on, however, if the source is really a source and not just one said to be a source when the real source is a source quick to say "I heard blah, blah, blah." That again, would depend on the source's true source.
Where did all this information come from? The source of course.
|
You have taken Out-sourcing to a whole new level!
Threaded Mode
