Quote:
Originally Posted by pelathais
Following up on the RATE (Radioisotopes and the Age of the Earth) research project at the Institute for Creation Research
Your post sounded like boiler plate: simply Googling one phrase at random shows that you cut-and-pasted the entire post from http://www.answersingenesis.org/get-.../features/rate . This is Ken Ham's ministry. Even though this is an informal forum- a post which consists entirely of cut-and-paste from another website deserves a link back to the source.
If your idea of "exchange" is to simply cut and paste other people's words, then I'm left with the impression that you really don't have much interest in the discussion. Hit and run cut-and-paste. Sad. |
Sorry to make you feel so sad. I did copy and paste and thought I put a link. I did in my second post but I guess us YECs aren't allowed to make any mistakes but old earth Creationist can have moutains of them. I Can't refute every thing you said because I don't claim to be an expert on the subject. Though I have researched YEC, OEC, secular evolutionist and others theories.
In all my research the YEC seem to make the most sense to me. I know my research is probablly a mustard seed compared to yours but I make decisions based on what I understand. Here is what I don't understand about old earth views. No where in history do you see records of an old earth. Any where the begining of the earth is talked about there seems to be a sudden appereance of mankind. The bible doesn't show an old earth unless you seem to have to add to words like "day". Here is an article (
Not mine)
that really makes sense to me. I will post it in my next post.
Threaded Mode
