Quote:
Originally Posted by stmatthew
Sis Barb,
Here is KH's letter for your review. It is obvious in his letter that he places those that are structuring the Tulsa group as out of Gods will, and on a path to destruction, and any that follow them will come to ruin.
|
In the beginning of all of these discussions following 'the vote', I was quite vocal, but it has grieved my spirit so that I have tried to stay away from it if I can.
But I have a question, Matt...is what was posted by the WPF any different that Bro. Haney's comments?!
"The formation of WPF is an outgrowth of the changing times and directions within the North American apostolic movement and is the result of a constellation of events and decisions which have shaped apostolic direction for some time—
some, we fear, for the worse, and ours hopefully for the better."
In other words, "Our way is the better way!!"
And what about this: "WPF is an honest attempt to embrace and work with any and all
authentic Apostolics..."
What is an "authentic Apostolic" and who determines who fits the bill?!
And if they are pulling away from the UPCI and no longer embracing and working with them, does this mean they (the UPCI brethren) are no longer considered "authentic Apostolics?!"
See how this thing works?!
I don't know...it's all a mess as far as I am concerned...each one is saying, "Come over here...follow us!!"
I respect and love Bishop W as a fine man of God and always have, but what good is going to come of this?!
If it were in my power to do so, I would discourage anyone from going to Tulsa...this is just how I see it from my house.
Threaded Mode
