Quote:
Originally Posted by TCSQ
What conclusions dont have some flaws? But over all the fact that this author is NOT approaching the subject from a religious pro or con bias but is merely stating a pretty recognizable fact, one that has been stated here by NON zoologist obserevers, completely independent of the book ,that when people are sexually aroused their eyes cheeks and lifps take on a different cast or hue and become flushed, is one that simply cant be argued with as THEY DO! Cosmetics that duplicate that appearance DO send out subliminal messages, and of course that subliminal message being "I am sexually aroused right now...."
Of course we can pretend thats a bunch of nonsense, howeveer thee fact remains....it's NOT.
To inform people of that and the message in back of duplicating that sexually aroused appearance is not old fashioned, it is absolutely imperative.
Let me ask you when you see little eight year old girls in public painted up with red lips, flushed cheeks and all kinds of makep on the eyes to draw attention to them...does it bother YOU? I know it bothers many secular people who do NOT have a reservation about makeup. And on a mere surface consideration of WHY it would be the oft stated SECULAR realization that this is SEXUALLIZNG children, ergo, the WORLD recognizes that this practice is one that deals with SEXUALITY. Flawed conclusion or the logical one you decide.
|
A conclusion that is based on a false premise is a false conclusion.
I have never seen anyone’s eye lashes turn darker or longer, eyelids turn blue or green or whatever color they put on their eyelids, when sexually aroused.
Many of the things you describe that takes place on a persons face when they are aroused is the same thing that happens when they run half a mile. There cheeks get flushed then too.
Threaded Mode
