Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMasterMind
Pel pal, personally I believe the evidence is clear and convincing that Boora acted sua sponte. Either he felt he needed to take it on himself to protect Stoneking and others or he was trying to defend himself and livelihood derived from various diploma mills.
KB according to his own CV cannot practice law in the US since all jurisdictions here require law school. What is fascinating is from the inception he/they claimed to be protecting LS’s British interests. Really? What nexus is there to posts on this forum?
IF indeed it turns out that KB is not and has not been licensed even in England that would indeed be huge, since he has held out in numerous times, places and manners that he is.
Whether LS’s legal rep or not, if he is behind the call to Baron claiming to an investigating member of the DC bar, according to Griffin that may have even crossed the line to criminal.
Even without that it appears he has at least been linked to several criminal enterprises, ie diploma mills shut down by various governmental entities. (Hardly the person I would want defending my credentials)
As an aside in this truly bizarre episode, a collateral damage could be his ability to be taken seriously as a Oneness doctrinal author.
One can be an addict and still be an excellent attorney, a wife abuser but excellent doctor, but when it comes to theology unfortunately the character of the author becomes inextricably intertwined with his character.
The saga continues....
|
I agree with your analysis here, however I still think that there's a ball in Lee Stoneking's court to respond as well. Brother Boora will have to answer for his calls and misrepresentations himself, but LS has - at least in my mind - an obligation to respond as well when someone has claimed to be representing him in a legal manner.
While looking for a Boora in the ILEX database I came across several cases of misconduct by "Legal Executives." One particular case involved a Legal Executive who signed some papers on behalf of her client instead of having that client sign as required. She essentially misrepresented herself as acting on behalf of her client without her client's knowledge. That got her a two year suspension.
Can Lee help our understanding here? Was this entire AFF board threatened with being "shut down" by his legal representatives as it was stated on the AMF board?
Threaded Mode
