Quote:
Originally Posted by pelathais
I have a standing concern: In "Knight's" post where he at least claimed to be "Lee Stoneking's British lawyer..." he shifts to the plural "we" and now offers the suggestion that he was never claiming to be that lawyer himself.
Clearly, Knight (who has identified himself as Pastor A. Wilson) was under the impression that he at least had a "British lawyer" by his side. Also, JN Anderson was in telephone contact with Kulwant "Kal" Boora and came away with the idea that he had just spoken to the lawyer who was "going to bring AFF down."
Has Kal Boora represented himself as Lee Stoneking's legal council in these matters? If so, until Bro. Stoneking speaks up - we can reasonably proceed under the assumption that Kal Boora does indeed represent Lee Stoneking's interests in these matters.
We have telephone conversations with Bro. Boora representing himself as actually being in England - only an hour or two after he was contacted by cell phone in Michigan. The Concorde is no longer flying, so I don't see how this would be possible.
Brother Stoneking: Is Kalwant "Kal" Boora your legal representative?
May we proceed according to his claims that he is?
|
Pel pal, personally I believe the evidence is clear and convincing that Boora acted sua sponte. Either he felt he needed to take it on himself to protect Stoneking and others or he was trying to defend himself and livelihood derived from various diploma mills.
KB according to his own CV cannot practice law in the US since all jurisdictions here require law school. What is fascinating is from the inception he/they claimed to be protecting LS’s British interests. Really? What nexus is there to posts on this forum?
IF indeed it turns out that KB is not and has not been licensed even in England that would indeed be huge, since he has held out in numerous times, places and manners that he is.
Whether LS’s legal rep or not, if he is behind the call to Baron claiming to an investigating member of the DC bar, according to Griffin that may have even crossed the line to criminal.
Even without that it appears he has at least been linked to several criminal enterprises, ie diploma mills shut down by various governmental entities. (Hardly the person I would want defending my credentials)
As an aside in this truly bizarre episode, a collateral damage could be his ability to be taken seriously as a Oneness doctrinal author.
One can be an addict and still be an excellent attorney, a wife abuser but excellent doctor, but when it comes to theology unfortunately the character of the author becomes inextricably intertwined with his character.
The saga continues....
Threaded Mode
