|
Tab Menu 1
| Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun! |
 |
|

05-29-2013, 11:36 AM
|
 |
Unvaxxed Pureblood
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Zion aka TEXAS
Posts: 26,945
|
|
|
The church in history
Who says the church, the REAL church, must be visible throughout history from Pentecost till now?
The Reformed Protestant doctrine is not apostolic succession, but apostolic continuity - ie, the real church is whoever believes and practices the Bible, whenever they may be living.
The Catholic/Orthodox churches claim apostolic succession - ie, one must point to a continuously visible and continuously existing 'church' to identify the 'real' church.
Not saying either is correct, just pointing out to seekerman that his argument against OPs being representative of the true church is outside the pale of Reformed, Protestant, and Evangelical orthodoxy, and would be recognizable as valid only by a catholic/Eastern Orthodox person.
Just saying.
|

05-29-2013, 11:39 AM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 31,124
|
|
|
Re: The church in history
I'm a Restorationist. I believe in what might be best described in this chart:
Last edited by Aquila; 05-29-2013 at 11:43 AM.
|

05-29-2013, 11:41 AM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,406
|
|
|
Re: The church in history
Quote:
Originally Posted by Esaias
Who says the church, the REAL church, must be visible throughout history from Pentecost till now?
The Reformed Protestant doctrine is not apostolic succession, but apostolic continuity - ie, the real church is whoever believes and practices the Bible, whenever they may be living.
The Catholic/Orthodox churches claim apostolic succession - ie, one must point to a continuously visible and continuously existing 'church' to identify the 'real' church.
Not saying either is correct, just pointing out to seekerman that his argument against OPs being representative of the true church is outside the pale of Reformed, Protestant, and Evangelical orthodoxy, and would be recognizable as valid only by a catholic/Eastern Orthodox person.
Just saying.
|
My issue is that oneness pentecostals cannot find the Church of Jesus Christ during the 1800s, a relatively recent century. Yet, after 1913, they suddenly can find the Church of Jesus Christ. Why?
|

05-29-2013, 11:43 AM
|
 |
Unvaxxed Pureblood
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Zion aka TEXAS
Posts: 26,945
|
|
|
Re: The church in history
Quote:
Originally Posted by seekerman
My issue is that oneness pentecostals cannot find the Church of Jesus Christ during the 1800s, a relatively recent century. Yet, after 1913, they suddenly can find the Church of Jesus Christ. Why?
|
And my issue is 'why is that a problem'? lol
|

05-29-2013, 11:49 AM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,406
|
|
|
Re: The church in history
Quote:
Originally Posted by Esaias
And my issue is 'why is that a problem'? lol
|
Oh, I realize that the sudden appearance of the Church of Jesus Christ after centuries of absence isn't a problem for many oneness pentecostals. The dominance of satan over the Church of Jesus Christ doesn't bother them at all it seems.
But.....why the sudden appearance of the Church of Jesus Christ in 1913? What was going on before then? Was the Church of Jesus Christ dead, buried, in hiding, afraid of the enemy....what?
1913 is a pivotal year in the sudden appearance of the Church of Jesus Christ it seems. Satan was completely victorious over the Church until that year?
|

05-29-2013, 11:55 AM
|
 |
Unvaxxed Pureblood
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Zion aka TEXAS
Posts: 26,945
|
|
|
Re: The church in history
Quote:
Originally Posted by seekerman
Oh, I realize that the sudden appearance of the Church of Jesus Christ after centuries of absence isn't a problem for many oneness pentecostals. The dominance of satan over the Church of Jesus Christ doesn't bother them at all it seems.
But.....why the sudden appearance of the Church of Jesus Christ in 1913? What was going on before then? Was the Church of Jesus Christ dead, buried, in hiding, afraid of the enemy....what?
1913 is a pivotal year in the sudden appearance of the Church of Jesus Christ it seems. Satan was completely victorious over the Church until that year?
|
How about YOU TELL US where the church was down through the ages?
|

05-29-2013, 11:58 AM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,406
|
|
|
Re: The church in history
Quote:
Originally Posted by Esaias
How about YOU TELL US where the church was down through the ages?
|
LOL. I'm trying to find out why oneness pentecostals can't find the Church of Jesus Christ in the 1800s but no problem after 1913. Do you have any thoughts on why 1913 is such a pivotal year for the sudden appearance of the Church of Jesus Christ?
|

05-29-2013, 02:34 PM
|
|
Apostolic Pentecostal
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 700
|
|
|
Re: The church in history
Quote:
Originally Posted by seekerman
Oh, I realize that the sudden appearance of the Church of Jesus Christ after centuries of absence isn't a problem for many oneness pentecostals. The dominance of satan over the Church of Jesus Christ doesn't bother them at all it seems.
But.....why the sudden appearance of the Church of Jesus Christ in 1913? What was going on before then? Was the Church of Jesus Christ dead, buried, in hiding, afraid of the enemy....what?
1913 is a pivotal year in the sudden appearance of the Church of Jesus Christ it seems. Satan was completely victorious over the Church until that year?
|
Why was 1522 suddenly a in Church History? Where was the "Real Church of Jesus Christ" prior to that? How is that pivotal moment any different from 1913? (Or 1901 for that matter). Both came through the revelation of the Spirit. Both changed history. How is it different?
By the way, in case you haven't noticed; satan remains firmly in control of that portion of the so-called pre-1522 "Church." It's called the RCC!
|

05-29-2013, 02:29 PM
|
|
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 30
|
|
|
Re: The church in history
Quote:
Originally Posted by seekerman
My issue is that oneness pentecostals cannot find the Church of Jesus Christ during the 1800s, a relatively recent century. Yet, after 1913, they suddenly can find the Church of Jesus Christ. Why?
|
Do you believe in speaking in tounges as evidence of the Holy Spirit?
__________________
Thanks in advance for correcting or ignoring my poor grammar
|

05-29-2013, 05:00 PM
|
 |
Repent and believe the Gospel!
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Jacksonville FL
Posts: 3,090
|
|
|
Re: The church in history
Quote:
Originally Posted by Julian
Do you believe in speaking in tounges as evidence of the Holy Spirit?
|
Fruit of the Spirit is not tongues.
__________________
Who art thou that judgest another man's servant? to his own master he standeth or falleth. Yea, he shall be holden up: for God is able to make him stand. (Romans 14:4)
Scripture is its own interpreter. Nothing can cut a diamond but a diamond. Nothing can interpret Scripture but Scripture" Thomas Watson.
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:34 PM.
| |