|
Tab Menu 1
| Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun! |
 |
|

11-03-2014, 02:42 PM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 23,543
|
|
|
Re: Apostolic But Not Believing Jesus is The Fathe
Quote:
Originally Posted by mfblume
You just worship Ishtarte or Ashtaroeth in Passover and I will serve God. How about that?
|
Mike just take 5 minutes to read this, thats all it took me.
It is better for you in your next debate against KJV only.(you may not want to use Easter as a point).....
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=...78677474,d.cGU
|

11-03-2014, 03:38 PM
|
 |
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Portage la Prairie, MB CANADA
Posts: 38,161
|
|
|
Re: Apostolic But Not Believing Jesus is The Fathe
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sean
|
What, read that commentary???? You violate your own arguments!
Sorry, Sean. PASCHA's definition says nothing about all this theory that Herod was celebrating Ishtarte. That is an excuse to think the KJV was inspired by God when the translators chose EASTER over PASSOVER as much as Paul and Peter were inspired of God. And I reject that paganizing excuse for passover. But there is nothing in the GREEK WORD PASCHA that would warrant the KJV translators for CHANGING the word to EASTER instead of PASSOVER. The word means PASSOVER.
__________________
...MY THOUGHTS, ANYWAY.
"Many Christians do not try to understand what was written in a verse in the Bible. Instead they approach the passage to prove what they already believe."
Last edited by mfblume; 11-03-2014 at 03:46 PM.
|

11-03-2014, 05:51 PM
|
 |
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 9,001
|
|
|
Re: Apostolic But Not Believing Jesus is The Fathe
Quote:
Originally Posted by mfblume
What, read that commentary???? You violate your own arguments!
Sorry, Sean. PASCHA's definition says nothing about all this theory that Herod was celebrating Ishtarte. That is an excuse to think the KJV was inspired by God when the translators chose EASTER over PASSOVER as much as Paul and Peter were inspired of God. And I reject that paganizing excuse for passover. But there is nothing in the GREEK WORD PASCHA that would warrant the KJV translators for CHANGING the word to EASTER instead of PASSOVER. The word means PASSOVER.
|
How about context? The best way to know the meaning of a word is context.
__________________
You better watch out before I blitzkrieg your thread cause I'm the Thread Nazi now!
|

11-03-2014, 06:44 PM
|
 |
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Portage la Prairie, MB CANADA
Posts: 38,161
|
|
|
Re: Apostolic But Not Believing Jesus is The Fathe
Quote:
Originally Posted by jfrog
How about context? The best way to know the meaning of a word is context.
|
Amen. That determines the narrowed down version of the varied definitions available. But definition cannot be disregarded. The story of Herod implies nothing about Easter instead of passover.
Jerusalem was under Passover Law.
Acts 12:3-4 KJV And because he saw it pleased the Jews, he proceeded further to take Peter also. (Then were the days of unleavened bread.) (4) And when he had apprehended him, he put him in prison, and delivered him to four quaternions of soldiers to keep him; intending after Easter to bring him forth to the people.
Since unleavened bread was part of Passover, and just mentioned in verse 11 before pascha was referred to, We know that the reference to the jewish feast in verse 11 is what verse 12 referred to with PASCHA. Since they days of unleavened bread were occurring when Herod sought to take Peter, and since Unleavened bread and firstfruits were all part of the PASSOVER feast, and because civil works could not occur during passover by HEBREW LAW, then Herod had to wait til after PASSOVER to deal with Peter.
Verse 11'as use of unleavened bread prove that pascha is passover.
__________________
...MY THOUGHTS, ANYWAY.
"Many Christians do not try to understand what was written in a verse in the Bible. Instead they approach the passage to prove what they already believe."
Last edited by mfblume; 11-03-2014 at 07:14 PM.
|

11-03-2014, 07:36 PM
|
 |
Go Dodgers!
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 45,794
|
|
|
Re: Apostolic But Not Believing Jesus is The Fathe
Quote:
Originally Posted by Praxeas
Once again there is a HUGE difference between "They tested God" and "God was tempted to commit evil"
You guys are using one word that has several meanings as if it only has one meaning
ESV Psa 78:56 Yet they tested and rebelled against the Most High God and did not keep his testimonies,
This is the same as this?...The ESV is a FAKE translation(different word meanings)
Now I see the problem you have. First of all, it was proven that the word there means Tested by brother Blume.
Second of all, it's more accurate than a translation that was made in a language nobody but false prophets and shakesperean actors talk in.
When they translated the KJV the word Tempt Meant TEST. Research it
KJV Psa 78:56 Yet they tempted and provoked the most high God, and kept not his testimonies:
Thats not the same as Temptations of the flesh
Mat 26:41 Watch and pray that you may not enter into temptation. The spirit indeed is willing, but the flesh is weak."
Jas 1:12 Blessed is the man who endures temptation, because having been approved, he will receive the crown of life which the Lord has promised to those who love Him.
Jas 1:13 Let no one being tempted say, I am tempted from God. For God is not tempted by evils, and He tempts no one.
Jas 1:14 But each one is tempted by his lusts, being drawn away and seduced by them.
Testing God is not the same thing as Man being tempted by the flesh. God was not Tempted by his own flesh to sin.
That's not Greek. That's English
Tempt
peirasmós; gen. peirasmoú, masc. noun from peirázō (G3985), to make trial of, try, tempt. Trial, temptation, a putting to the test, spoken of persons only. When God is the agent, peirasmós is for the purpose of proving someone, never for the purpose of causing him to fall. If it is the devil who tempts, then it is for the purpose of causing one to fall.
(I) Generally, trial of one's character (1Pe_4:12, "to try [or prove] you"). By implication, trial of one's virtue, temptation, solicitation to sin, especially from Satan ( Luk_4:13; 1Ti_6:9).
(II) Trial, temptation.
(A) A state of trial in which God brings His people through adversity and affliction in order to encourage and prove their faith and confidence in Him ( Mat_6:13; Mat_26:41; Mar_14:38; Luk_8:13; Luk_11:4, "bring us not into a state of trial" [a.t.], lay not trials upon us; Luk_22:40, Luk_22:46; 1Co_10:13; Jam_1:2, Jam_1:12; 1Pe_1:6; 2Pe_2:9; Sept.: Deu_7:19; Deu_29:3). Hence used metonymically for adversity, affliction, sorrow ( Luk_22:28; Act_20:19; Gal_4:14; Rev_3:10).
(B) In the opposite way, man "tempts" God by distrusting Him and complaining to Him ( Heb_3:8 quoted from Psa_95:8; Sept.: Exo_17:7; Deu_9:22).
You are confusing "Being tempted to sin or do evil" with humans attempting to test God
Exo 20:20 Moses said to the people, "Do not fear, for God has come to test you, that the fear of him may be before you, that you may not sin."
Deu 6:16 "You shall not put the LORD your God to the test, as you tested him at Massah.
|
Quote:
|
Prax, you said all that to say the KJV translators were wrong and you and your FAKE, ESV Bible and its modern day, copyright restricted author, using FAKE GREEK, is the "more accurate" translation.
|
....
Is that really the best argument you can come up with? Seriously?
So the the KJV is contradicting itself saying God can't be tempted but you come alone and say he can?
Quote:
tempt (tmpt)
v. temptˇed, temptˇing, tempts
v.tr.
1. To try to get (someone) to do wrong, especially by a promise of reward.
2. To be inviting or attractive to: A second helping tempted me. We refused the offer even though it tempted us. See Synonyms at lure.
3. To provoke or to risk provoking: Don't tempt fate.
4. To cause to be strongly disposed: He was tempted to walk out.
|
You should have given the link to that dictionary to see what you left out
1175-1225; Middle English < Latin temptāre to probe, feel, test, tempt
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/tempt
that's the problem with reading a bible translated into an outdated language
Quote:
Exodus 20:20
20 And Moses said unto the people, Fear not: for God is come to prove you, and that his fear may be before your faces, that ye sin not.
prove
pro͞ov/Submit
verb
1.
demonstrate the truth or existence of (something) by evidence or argument.
"the concept is difficult to prove"
synonyms: show (to be true), demonstrate (the truth of), show beyond doubt, manifest, produce proof/evidence;
|
right PROVE . Same word is translated TEMPT in the KJV in other verses.
And once again the word Prove, before Modern English, meant TEST
1125-75; Middle English proven < Old French prover < Latin probāre to try, test, prove, approve, derivative of probus good.
But in our modern english Proving someone is not TEMPTING someone to sin
Quote:
|
All other bibles, other than the Received Text bibles(KJV), are derived from a "counterfeit" Greek of two heretic authors...Westcott and Hort
|
ROFL...so you are a KJVO and a conspiracy theorist too?
__________________
Let it be understood that Apostolic Friends Forum is an Apostolic Forum.
Apostolic is defined on AFF as:
- There is One God. This one God reveals Himself distinctly as Father, Son and Holy Ghost.
- The Son is God himself in a human form or "God manifested in the flesh" (1Tim 3:16)
- Every sinner must repent of their sins.
- That Jesus name baptism is the only biblical mode of water baptism.
- That the Holy Ghost is for today and is received by faith with the initial evidence of speaking in tongues.
- The saint will go on to strive to live a holy life, pleasing to God.
Last edited by Praxeas; 11-03-2014 at 07:46 PM.
|

11-03-2014, 07:40 PM
|
 |
Go Dodgers!
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 45,794
|
|
|
Re: Apostolic But Not Believing Jesus is The Fathe
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sean
Like I said Mike, you dont agree with the KJV bible and are trying to redefine the actual words by a COMMENTATORS" definition.....
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mfblume
No, they're not commentators. lol THEY ARE KJV HEBREW SCHOLARS. Now, answer again.
|
good grief.
__________________
Let it be understood that Apostolic Friends Forum is an Apostolic Forum.
Apostolic is defined on AFF as:
- There is One God. This one God reveals Himself distinctly as Father, Son and Holy Ghost.
- The Son is God himself in a human form or "God manifested in the flesh" (1Tim 3:16)
- Every sinner must repent of their sins.
- That Jesus name baptism is the only biblical mode of water baptism.
- That the Holy Ghost is for today and is received by faith with the initial evidence of speaking in tongues.
- The saint will go on to strive to live a holy life, pleasing to God.
|

11-03-2014, 07:45 PM
|
 |
Go Dodgers!
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 45,794
|
|
|
Re: Apostolic But Not Believing Jesus is The Fathe
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sean
Were your modern day scholars you use, part of the Recieved Text scholars in 1611 or are they from recent years of modern translators?
|
The Received Text was the GREEK NT only not the Hebrew OTW. And it was put together years earlier, NOT by the KJV translators. It was put together by men like Erasmus or Stephanus
__________________
Let it be understood that Apostolic Friends Forum is an Apostolic Forum.
Apostolic is defined on AFF as:
- There is One God. This one God reveals Himself distinctly as Father, Son and Holy Ghost.
- The Son is God himself in a human form or "God manifested in the flesh" (1Tim 3:16)
- Every sinner must repent of their sins.
- That Jesus name baptism is the only biblical mode of water baptism.
- That the Holy Ghost is for today and is received by faith with the initial evidence of speaking in tongues.
- The saint will go on to strive to live a holy life, pleasing to God.
|

11-03-2014, 07:49 PM
|
 |
Go Dodgers!
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 45,794
|
|
|
Re: Apostolic But Not Believing Jesus is The Fathe
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sean
Like I said Mike, you did not live 500 years ago, nor your modern scholars.
These "nuckleheads" knew more than you will ever know about translating the Bible.
|
And your "KJV scholars" did not live 2000 years ago. The fact is words change over time and words used in the 1600s often have a different meaning today
__________________
Let it be understood that Apostolic Friends Forum is an Apostolic Forum.
Apostolic is defined on AFF as:
- There is One God. This one God reveals Himself distinctly as Father, Son and Holy Ghost.
- The Son is God himself in a human form or "God manifested in the flesh" (1Tim 3:16)
- Every sinner must repent of their sins.
- That Jesus name baptism is the only biblical mode of water baptism.
- That the Holy Ghost is for today and is received by faith with the initial evidence of speaking in tongues.
- The saint will go on to strive to live a holy life, pleasing to God.
|

11-03-2014, 07:52 PM
|
 |
Go Dodgers!
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 45,794
|
|
|
Re: Apostolic But Not Believing Jesus is The Fathe
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sean
Yep, the T.R. was translated by men who were the cream of the crop to translate the Bible for the English speaking language, unlike Westcott and Hort of the 1800s
|
Sean, you really have no idea what you are talking about
The T.R. is NOT a Translation. It's a Greek Text compiled from late Greek Manuscripts by a person, not a committee, and the one the KJV New testament was translated from was done years earlier by Stephanus
__________________
Let it be understood that Apostolic Friends Forum is an Apostolic Forum.
Apostolic is defined on AFF as:
- There is One God. This one God reveals Himself distinctly as Father, Son and Holy Ghost.
- The Son is God himself in a human form or "God manifested in the flesh" (1Tim 3:16)
- Every sinner must repent of their sins.
- That Jesus name baptism is the only biblical mode of water baptism.
- That the Holy Ghost is for today and is received by faith with the initial evidence of speaking in tongues.
- The saint will go on to strive to live a holy life, pleasing to God.
|

11-03-2014, 07:57 PM
|
 |
Go Dodgers!
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 45,794
|
|
|
Re: Apostolic But Not Believing Jesus is The Fathe
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sean
Sure I do, the KJV translators spoke of a PAGAN HOLIDAY when the used "easter" there, no doubt.
Like I said, you have no TRUE Bible, in your mind, words are up for grabs.
|
You REALLY don't know what you are talking about.
It was the Passove
Act 12:3 And because he saw it pleased the Jews, he proceeded further to take Peter also. (Then were the days of unleavened bread.)
Act 12:4 And when he had apprehended him, he put him in prison, and delivered him to four quaternions of soldiers to keep him; intending after Easter to bring him forth to the people.
Unleavened Bread was Jewish not Pagan.
Jews Celebrate Passover around the time Christians today celebrate Easter. It is a bad translation
The actual greek word is Pascha meaning "Pass over"
__________________
Let it be understood that Apostolic Friends Forum is an Apostolic Forum.
Apostolic is defined on AFF as:
- There is One God. This one God reveals Himself distinctly as Father, Son and Holy Ghost.
- The Son is God himself in a human form or "God manifested in the flesh" (1Tim 3:16)
- Every sinner must repent of their sins.
- That Jesus name baptism is the only biblical mode of water baptism.
- That the Holy Ghost is for today and is received by faith with the initial evidence of speaking in tongues.
- The saint will go on to strive to live a holy life, pleasing to God.
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:10 AM.
| |