Do you think Revelations is enigmatic?

[Aquila]

Originally Posted by TK Burk

Let me see if I'm getting this right, you contend that it's not about misinterpreting what is written, but instead not altering the actual wording in the document. is that right?

Yes. Because if what is written is altered, false doctrine is a certainty. However, if the text is untampered with, regardless of one's understanding or lack of understanding the actual text remains unadulterated and the truth is always within reach for those who seek it.

So, the epistle should be placed under glass with an alarm system to keep out any typos, but those who read the unaltered text can believe anything they wish? Is that what you believe?

Whatever it takes.

Isn't that confusion? Isn't God not the author of such a mess?

Insuring textual integrity is essential for the development of proper doctrine.

Relative to what? You have the Scripture being written so that it causes fear to be its motivating force. Isn't "fear" said to be a spirit that's not of God?

There should be no fear of man, devil, or circumstance. However, we do well to fear God, who can destroy both body and soul in Hell, with a holy reverence.

However, the Revelation is a book of precious promise. One day all things will be under the direct Lordship of Jesus Christ.

I agree that the original text should remain as written. But I also believe it was written so the righteous could become sons of light and know all things. Otherwise, how could John's epistle be entitled "The REVELATION of Jesus Christ"? How do you "reveal" something that is buried in confusion and mystery?

I believe that even after it's all said and done, we'll find areas of Scripture, especially prophecy, wherein we were mistaken in our understanding and we'll stand in awe with how precise every fulfillment truly was.