Water baptism is not vital for salvation?

JamesGlen · #1 01-21-2018, 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa

Just so the KJV Nazis don’t get upset, the best way to explain the EIS “for” is with Matthew 26:28. Jesus’ blood wasn’t shed because their sins were already remitted. His blood is for the remittance. Therefore Acts 2:38 follows this.

Could it be argued that repentance and baptism in the name of Jesus, is because of what Jesus did to remit sins, per allignmemt w Matt.26:28 “blood purchase”?

Evang.Benincasa · #2 01-21-2018, 05:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JamesGlen

Could it be argued that repentance and baptism in the name of Jesus, is because of what Jesus did to remit sins, per allignmemt w Matt.26:28 “blood purchase”?

Then it would also flip side back tyo Matthew 26:28 in that Jesus blood was shed for many because their sins had already been remitted.