Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The Fellowship Hall > Fellowship Hall
Facebook

Notices

Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun!


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #9  
Old 04-06-2020, 01:23 PM
Ehud Ehud is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 541
Re: Tony Spell has church in spite of the ban

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tithesmeister View Post
Okay. Churches are automatically considered tax exempt. They have been (to my knowledge) since the UNITED STATES was born. Separation of church and state, and all that. There is a difference in being tax exempt and being a 501c3 though.



No. Churches are not automatically considered 501c3. Many people believe they are, but they are not. They are automatically tax exempt. Which is the case whether they are 501c3, or not.

To my knowledge, churches have never been taxed by the government in the United States. Why? Because the government has no authority over them as a religious organization. Some here have pointed out, and correctly so, that the government has jurisdiction over the building that the church meets in. Sewer, fire codes, plumbing, electrical etc..

So, as I have said before on here, the government has limited authority over the building, and some codes that are tangled up in the construction of the building, but they have no authority over whether, when, how often, you meet, or what doctrine is taught by the church. It is really none of their business.

UNLESS . . . They are a 501c3. Because, no church is automatically a 501c3. They are mostly QUALIFIED for 501c3. They have to apply for that dubious distinction. So . . . Think about that for a moment.

They apply to whom, for that designation?

They apply to the Secretary of State of the state they are geographically located in, Louisiana for Brother Spell. They are applying for the right to abandon their status as a separate entity from the state. They are begging (begging is maybe a bit strong verbiage here, but I’m making a point) for recognition of the fact that they are voluntarily giving up their status of separation from the state. I have NEVER heard of any church being turned down. The church of Scientology was initially, but they appealed and were granted status.

So what happens when they are granted this status? They give up the status of separation, and agree to incorporate, under the laws of the State of Louisiana, in the case of Brother Spell. A corporation is a legal entity. Incorporated UNDER the laws of the state is a legal matter. The church that is incorporated under the laws of the state, are legally bound to obey the laws of that state that apply to such corporations.

That’s the condensed version, as I understand it. Some people are going to dispute this, no doubt, but I have studied it somewhat and I’m pretty sure this is accurate.

Why do churches give up their sovereignty? Because it is widely believed to be a good deal for them. And . . .

DONATIONS ARE OFFICIALLY TAX DEDUCTIBLE. So it comes back to money. The thing is that donations to churches are not disputed by the IRS anyway. But that’s all part of the illusion.

Some will believe,and they may say, otherwise. But law is not opinion. And 591c3 is a matter of law. I welcome other opinions, but I’d like to see documentation. If some would like to verify what I’m saying, or would like to dispute it, do a search on 501c3 status. It is a designation found in IRS tax code.
You're in over your head on this one. I am a CPA that is well aware of what it means to be a 501(c)(3) organization. Simply calling yourself a church does not make you tax exempt. Meeting the specifications of section 501(c)(3) -- or other code section for that matter -- is what makes you tax exempt.

https://www.irs.gov/charities-non-pr...ns-of-churches
Churches (including integrated auxiliaries and conventions or associations of churches) that meet the requirements of section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code are automatically considered tax exempt and are not required to apply for and obtain recognition of exempt status from the IRS. Donors are allowed to claim a charitable deduction for donations to a church that meets the section 501(c)(3) requirements even though the church has neither sought nor received IRS recognition that it is tax exempt.
So if you believe that government oversight is hinged on being a 501(c)(3), I have some bad news for ya. And given that such applicability can be extended to unincorporated associations, if you truly want to avoid government oversight in the church world, I suggest house churches with no pooling of funds or centralized authority.
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Rev Tim Spell TakingDominion Fellowship Hall 7 08-02-2018 04:13 PM
Peace in Spite of Death KeptByTheWord Fellowship Hall 1 04-06-2015 07:51 PM
America Is Under A Spell. Scott Hutchinson Political Talk 1 07-21-2009 07:27 PM
Would you buy this on EBAY? Spell-Borat Chewy Fellowship Hall 0 07-22-2007 11:12 AM

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by Salome
- by Amanah

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.