A Night of Supernatural Events

Nahum · #1 09-07-2007, 08:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coonskinner

So do you see what I find objectionable?

Yes, I do.

He never called him a liar, but he definitely is claiming a superior word of knowledge. A gift of God is never a curse. Using RW's criterion for "trying the spirit" to determine prophetic accuracy, we should ascertain that RW's own prophetic gift is invalid. That is, if you believe gifts of the Spirit are good, and beneficial, and to be desired.

Coonskinner · #2 09-07-2007, 08:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pastor Poster

Yes, I do.

He never called him a liar, but he definitely is claiming a superior word of knowledge. A gift of God is never a curse. Using RW's criterion for "trying the spirit" to determine prophetic accuracy, we should ascertain that RW's prophetic gift is invalid. That is, if you believe gifts of the Spirit are good, and beneficial, and to be desired.

Not specifically, perhaps, but the implication is clear.

Sherri · #3 09-07-2007, 08:15 AM

This has become a very sad thread, indeed. I admire Steadfast and his enthusiasm and zeal for the Lord and for revival. I believe his reports because I know the giftings of the Spirit are real; I've witnessed them in action too many times to doubt them.

There are lots of things on this forum that I question, but I respect the men/women who wrote them. CAN'T WE ALL JUST GET ALONG???????

Coonskinner · #4 09-07-2007, 08:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sherri

This has become a very sad thread, indeed. I admire Steadfast and his enthusiasm and zeal for the Lord and for revival. I believe his reports because I know the giftings of the Spirit are real; I've witnessed them in action too many times to doubt them.

There are lots of things on this forum that I question, but I respect the men/women who wrote them. CAN'T WE ALL JUST GET ALONG???????

I do my best to get along, Sherri, but a line has been crossed this time that I can't ignore.

I hope some resolution to this matter comes soon.

Esther · #5 09-07-2007, 08:21 AM

Do you think the enemy hates this thread?

I do.

He will use anyone to try and sow discord and doubt.

I am not going to buy into it!

This thread needs to turn back to where it began with the wonderous works of God.

We can not make someone believe the good reports of God, but we can choose to not let them bring us down.

I think we should flood this thread with the good reports of God!

I know the enemy would really hate that.

SDG · #6 09-07-2007, 08:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Esther

Do you think the enemy hates this thread?

I do.

He will use anyone to try and sow discord and doubt.

I am not going to buy into it!

This thread needs to turn back to where it began with the wonderous works of God.

We can not make someone believe the good reports of God, but we can choose to not let them bring us down.

I think we should flood this thread with the good reports of God!

I know the enemy would really hate that.

Often doubt is sown by our enemy ... and often is a product of our own minds.

Coonskinner · #7 09-07-2007, 08:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Esther

Do you think the enemy hates this thread?

I do.

He will use anyone to try and sow discord and doubt.

I am not going to buy into it!

This thread needs to turn back to where it began with the wonderous works of God.

We can not make someone believe the good reports of God, but we can choose to not let them bring us down.

I think we should flood this thread with the good reports of God!

I know the enemy would really hate that.

Esther, are you an admin?

These are nice thoughts, and I appreciate them, but there is an issue here that I am very interested in.

I want to know if this is going to be deemed acceptable. If it is, that is fine, but I won't participate.

Everybody has their line, and I am about to find mine.

If men of God of the caliber of Steadfast and his evangelist can be basically called liars, fakes, and snake oil salesmen, I'm done.

I reported a post here a few days ago, but please draw admin's attention to this thread, so a statement can be issued.

Esther · #8 09-07-2007, 08:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coonskinner

Esther, are you an admin?

These are nice thoughts, and I appreciate them, but there is an issue here that I am very interested in.

I want to know if this is going to be deemed acceptable. If it is, that is fine, but I won't participate.

Everybody has their line, and I am about to find mine.

If men of God of the caliber of Steadfast and his evangelist can be basically called liars, fakes, and snake oil salesmen, I'm done.

I reported a post here a few days ago, but please draw admin's attention to this thread, so a statement can be issued.

Yes, I am an Admin and this is being view and under discussion.

Sherri · #9 09-07-2007, 08:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coonskinner

I do my best to get along, Sherri, but a line has been crossed this time that I can't ignore.

I hope some resolution to this matter comes soon.

Well, I can't say that I blame you on that. But I know once I wrote a report about a prophet that had been in service with us, and he got blasted (by name) and ridiculed and called a false prophet. I know it was real, so I chose to ignore them, but it still hurt.

mizpeh · #10 09-07-2007, 08:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sherri

Well, I can't say that I blame you on that. But I know once I wrote a report about a prophet that had been in service with us, and he got blasted (by name) and ridiculed and called a false prophet. I know it was real, so I chose to ignore them, but it still hurt.

Despise not prophecy.